People on FR and other places give various theories about which I have either not done research or haven’t been able to conclude anything definite, or even a strong leaning one way or another.
For instance, the subject of whether Miki Booth is an obot mole who contributed to the forgery of Obama’s fake BC. I have no way of knowing whether that is true or not. So what do I do? I just stay away from it. Why would I go on a thread and say, “I have looked at all of Doug Vogt’s evidence/claims and I am here to call him crazy because I have looked at all his stuff and can’t figure out or know anything about the subject.”
If you can’t tell anything that you’re seeing in the water, that’s fine. Just say the images are too blurry to pick out anything for certain. It could be that the size or resolution of your computer screen, the loss of clarity from youtube, the absence of more context, etc is keeping you from seeing something clearly enough to convince you. That’s fine. Or it could be that the images themselves just aren’t clear enough. It is what it is.
People who haven’t been able to look at the non-pixelated video hundreds of times, as I’ve been able to do, though, have come up with explanations that I can assure people don’t make sense. For instance, a good friend showed me an image of what he thought was a shoe shape with a light stripe at the bottom connected to a leg shape. He asked me if that’s what I saw. I said that the shoe shape there was the same “wave” shape that I had watched zoom all over the video screen as if it was a wave (but never breaking like the other “waves” in the video), yards away from Fuddy, and which actually a few frames later turns around and shows a face inside a hoodie-type contraption, with a light attached on the top. A few frames after that the hoodie turns around and you can see that it has a yellow stripe along the backside. A shoe couldn’t turn around like that shape does - not without jerking the wearer of the shoe way off into another direction.
Without showing every frame in that video, Joe Blow might say that was a shoe, or might say that he can’t tell what it is. And that’s fine. That’s part of what ABC wanted to happen, when they pixelated the videos and refused to let me show the complete non-pixelated video. Others will say that they see this or that. I’ve posted images of what appears to me to be 5 distinct people in the water who cannot be any of the 9 who were said to be on that plane. I can point out eyewear, chin, and Jacob’s hand holding onto one of those persons. I can point out white goggles and a yellow scuba mask on another. I can point out muscular dark arms, a rebreather, a tube going from the face down towards the chest, and the chin of another. Etc. You and others don’t know what you’re seeing, and that’s fine. Others can see what I believe I’m seeing or believe they can see even more than I think I can see.
I’ve posted a couple different places and have also done 3 radio shows now, and the place I have gotten BY FAR the worst response is here at Free Republic.
Could be because the people in power here have made it clear they will gag and/or ban people they think are “batsh!t crazy”.
Could be the ridicule in the thread titles once the thread was moved to a more visible spot, against the forum’s rules.
Could be the “sock puppet accounts” that the fogbowers boast about having, or the countdown to when they will have libeled me out and down for the count, having lost all credibility. They are a pack of wolves who come out for the kill, and they brag about the various researchers they have picked off from the flock and devoured.
Could be because Freepers are pickier than most about the level of evidence.
Could be a lot of different reasons. But I’ve learned that Free Republic is the place I am most likely to get harsh, seemingly-coordinated attacks while those who aren’t harsh attackers just stay away to keep the flying blood and guts from spattering their clothes. Free Republic is NOT representative of the general public. The reasonableness of the general public almost brings me to tears after being here. That’s the intended effect of the psy-ops game that Obama’s internet warriors are supposed to play. It’s a systematic picking off of one sheep/cow/whatever, isolating it from its support, and then going for the jugular. It’s what wolves do, and Free Republic is the most wolf-ridden pasture of anywhere I’ve been. Probably because the people here are the ones Obama wants butchered...
The supportive responses from people who heard me on the radio shows I was on were sent to me by the hosts of those shows. But I was never allowed to receive them. Those emails were stolen, just like some of my emails to those hosts were stolen, and some of my communications involving FOIA requests were stolen. The intent was to make me believe that I was alone. The crap to silence the non-wolves on Free Republic and the crap to steal the support towards me from other more normal places is a psy-op. A way to kill me without actually killing me.
Anybody in the military knows what I’m saying. And they know you don’t do that kind of intensive psy-op unless you’re afraid of that person or what might happen if you don’t silence or neutralize them. If somebody is distracting the enemy, or going down a dead end, you let them be or even encourage them. It’s only when you know a person could cause real trouble that you go in for the kill like that.
Arpaio and Zullo are going to come out with what they’ve got, and a lot of wolves are going to be exposed. A lot of people who sided with or enabled the wolves are going to have egg on their faces. And a lot of normal people who were simply deceived are going to realize how they were played. I don’t know who is who, in most cases. God does. And the sifting of wheat and chaff will come soon.
If you don’t see what I see, that’s fine. Just hold on, because if the deceptions all over the place are not visible to you yet, they will be soon. And the motives from a lot of hearts will be visible soon too.
When you level charges and accusations which some might view as wild, extreme and even imaginary (as I view them) just remember, the burden of proof is on you.
BZ “The supportive responses from people who heard me on the radio shows I was on were sent to me by the hosts of those shows. But I was never allowed to receive them. Those emails were stolen, just like some of my emails to those hosts were stolen, and some of my communications involving FOIA requests were stolen. The intent was to make me believe that I was alone. The crap to silence the non-wolves on Free Republic and the crap to steal the support towards me from other more normal places is a psy-op. A way to kill me without actually killing me.”
Could it be that no-one is intercepting your emails, but you have another IT issue similar to when you thought the regime was remotely accessing your PC to mess up your image analysis?