To: Rusty0604
And, to you tough-talking Neo-Cons with your AR-15 rifles and a few thousand rounds of ammo, here is the reality: they will take your guns, and no, all your Second Amendment bluster aside, you are not going to do anything about it. You are not going to take on a platoon of Marines with state-of-the-art automatic weapons...Then why are we still fighting in Afghanistan. Seems to me we should have walked over those guys.
7 posted on
02/21/2014 10:44:07 AM PST by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Starstruck
They probably wouldn’t have the same restrictive rules of engagement.
To: Starstruck
We could have, if not for the orders from the top to play nice with the Taliban instead of utterly crush them.
29 posted on
02/21/2014 10:59:28 AM PST by
Olog-hai
To: Starstruck
Then why are we still fighting in Afghanistan. Seems to me we should have walked over those guys. Precisely. The article presumes that you will be waiting inside your house. That would be foolish. When confiscation starts, the place to respond is as far away from your premises as possible. Public roads can be a dangerous place.
36 posted on
02/21/2014 11:01:57 AM PST by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: Starstruck
“...You are not going to take on a platoon of Marines...”
More likely it will be nine platoons of para-military Obamabots for a slice of the city and they will be taken on with 16 columns of militia.
As for the Marines, once some start going over to the other side...many will.
42 posted on
02/21/2014 11:06:32 AM PST by
Monterrosa-24
( ...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson