Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: varmintman

Aren’t monkey’s and chimp’s muscles much stronger than humans?

Ed


67 posted on 02/21/2014 12:08:45 AM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Sir_Ed

No. Apes arms are stronger than our arms because their arms are their major limbs, the comparison is between their arms and our legs. If you want to see how lame a chimp really is, have him try to run a competitive 440...


68 posted on 02/21/2014 3:17:48 AM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Sir_Ed
Aren’t monkey’s and chimp’s muscles much stronger than humans?

No, the moment arms and leverage is better in the great apes and chimpanzees, but the muscles, the chemical engine, is basically equally efficient. There is only so much energy that can be provided by that chemical engine. . . and the theoretical maximum land animal size that could live under one standard gravity—that is move, eat, mate—is approximately 14,000 kilos or about 31,000 pounds. But that is under ideal conditions. Practical is probably more like 20,000 lbs.

102 posted on 02/22/2014 5:52:41 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson