Please learn some basic reading skills. The article clearly says, and I quote:
it proved to be no less than one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein's General Relativity predicts.
No less than X-times larger, means it is at least that much larger. Not smaller. Larger.
And because "Experiment Trumps Theory®, Amen." Let us examine not what you have theorized the article says, but what I actually wrote.
The magnetic analog of gravity was predicted by HEAVISIDE in 1892. He predicted this on the basis of the fact that Maxwell's equations were known to be relativistically invariant, whereas Newton's Laws were not. This property is called Lorentz Invariance [or more commonly in the jargon Lorentz Covariance.] Physicists did not [then, 1892] know why this was true. Heaviside believed that the reason classical mechanics and electrodynamics did not agree was because Newton was wrong [and Heaviside was correct, and this magnetic analog does exist for gravity.]
Einstein is not the only person who worked on relativity. There were lots of other people who worked on relativity before, during, and after Einstein. A few during or before are: Lorentz, Poincare, Minkowski, and Maxwell, and Heaviside. Maxwell and Heaviside did not know about Lorentz invariance. But they knew the Lorentz force would be the same whether it was produced a reference frame in which electrons were moving or stationary.
The proof that Magenetism is nothing more than a relativistic manifestation of Electricity is something covered in every Junior/Senior level text in physics and EE -- and the next step, which every senior level physics student does, is to show gravity has the same property and to derive a version of "Maxwell's Equations" for gravity. This is what Heaviside did.
You claim to be a EE, so you should know Maxwell's Equations, and be able to easily understand this article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetism
And you should be better at reading than you are.
Fredzagonner, Fraudzagonner, FRaudhole.
Look, a-h. I don’t care which is more, Einstein’s prediction or the effect. One is larger than the other. Tell us WHY, instead of being an a-h all the time.
You’re so quick to jump on me for something. But you are INCREDIBLY SLOW to actually explain why something is 20 orders of magnitude off, one way or another. With each passing post you loudly proclaim how much of an a-h you are.
You already mentioned Heaviside. Repeating it just proves your a-hness, nothing more. Explain 20 orders of magnitude rather than continuing to be an a-h.