Well, you did use the word ‘dolt’, did you not?
But on an anonymous Internet forum that’s just kind of amusing, calling folks names. Water off a duck’s back.
The kid was shot and killed. You suggested you’d vote for acquittal and the only thing you noted in that post was the boomboxers and their evil loud music. I absolutlely did ridicule that notion by carrying it to its illogical extreme. Guilty as charged. I’d probably do it again if responding to a similar argument.
Dunn, from his gf’s testimony, had consumed 3 or 4 drinks at the wedding. Might he have had more? I wonder what his BAC was at the time of the shooting. I wonder if he was subject to a DUI. I wonder if his impulse control was where it might have been without drinking. Obviously, all speculation. This is where you and I seem to have some common ground, his state of mind. But we do very different things with it.
I think he was impaired by alcohol and lost his ability to control himself. You think he was pushed over the edge by loud evil music.
You’re right, neither of us was there. My interpretation of the minimal evidence we have in front of us is different from your interpretation. Seems the jury differed from you as well.
This never looked like 1st degree to me. Just a guy with a snoot full who let his emotions get the best of him. JMO.
Fair enough dmz. I have heard more about the case today. Perhaps this guy was out looking for trouble. Heck perhaps both were. Interesting about the bac. This incident should not have happened.
I did use the term dolt in reply to your attack. Water off a duck’s back. I was a bit irritated last night for some reason. Full moon, who knows.