Posted on 02/04/2014 6:23:18 AM PST by GregNH
Thanks Red Steel.
freeper / lurker since 98.
Your post is evidence enough of why I hang with the peeps at FR.
As he said here:
Crook- I know that Hayes as a hardcopy document handwriting expert would never get qualified to opine on the technical issues relevant to the WHLFBC. (Not that the issue will ever come up in any court.).
Handwriting expert? Qualified to opine on tech issues? He's an idiot. The thing was made from other Hawaiian BCs
He's right though about the White House fraudulent BC will never be put forth willingly or Obama is forced to do in a court of law since it really doesn't exist.
Oh well.
welcome to free republic
what did Hawaii affirm?
David? David Axelrod? I can’t believe it’s you! You’re actually far more charming in cyber space than I ever imagined. Shouldn’t you be at work? Oh wait- you ARE at work. My bad.
>> The State of Hawaii affirms the information is accurate.
Select information was verified as matching information in the official record. No official record has been produced. The only document produced by Hawaii is Onaka’s verification letter.
“Remind me please, what does Reed Hayes supposedly have to do with little barry bastard boy’s nativity?”
See my FR thread:
Obama’s Perkins Coie is a client of Arpaio’s expert, Reed Hayes, who says Obama’s BC is forged
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3027263/posts
And yet when Corsi's World News Daily went out and retained a real computer document expert, that expert's conclusion differed from yours:
[The WHLFBC] was analyzed by Ivan Zatkovich of Tampa-based eComp Consultants, which consults on intellectual property for telecommunications, web publishing and ecommerce and has provided services for corporations such as McGraw-Hill, Houghton-Mifflin, Citicorp and Amazon.com. Zatkovich has 28 years experience in computer science and document management and for more than 10 years has been an expert witness providing testimony in federal court in both criminal and civil litigation.
So did Mr. Zatkovich find evidence of "cut and paste?" Or "direct forgery?" No.
The report also addresses the white haloes around most of the printing on the document.
It has been suggested that these suspicious white borders indicate that items were pasted into the image. The pasting of content itself does not necessarily create a white border. A more likely reason for this halo effect is that the text was enhanced, the report said.
This does not mean that other content in the document was not changed. However, most of the detectable changes are consistent with someone attempting to enhance the appearance of the document rather than change the content.
(I'm omitting the link as I can't remember offhand the policy here on linking to other sites. If someone as 'stupid' as me can find it, I'm sure others can, too.)
So, wow, someone may have gone in after scanning and done a few things to enhance legibility. That's hardly proof of "document fraud." And this comes from WND, which is as Obama-loathing a site as they come.
“I know that Hayes as a hardcopy document handwriting expert would never get qualified to opine on the technical issues relevant to the WHLFBC.”
Hayes is both a document and handwriting expert and has testified repeatedly in that capacity apparently without being disqualified in a Daubert hearing, which he would have been if there were any grounds for his disqualification as an expert. Numerous document experts have pointed to typewriter-related issues which could prove that the BC is a forgery before it was ever placed in a Xerox to be copied.
I see no evidence that Hayes has ever claimed to be an expert in Xerox copier technical issues and I see no evidence that Zullo is relying on any analysis by Hayes of Xerox specific technical issues, if that is what you are getting at.
ROFLMAO keep spinning obot your head is about to fall off.
Thank you. I actually joined last March. Though I only post sporadically.
what did Hawaii affirm?
On the basic fact-in-issue regarding eligibility, the Hawaii Dept. of Health, per Dr. Onaka, stated:
[I] verify the following:
1. A birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.
So as to the question "Was Barack Obama born in Hawaii?" that statement is about as simple and direct an affirmation that Hawaii's vital records indicate "Yes" as one can draft.
Sure OBot Zat zot could be dumber than a door nail if he really believes Obama's nonsense. Turn in his degree because he's dumb.
All those rectangular white spaces filled in with layer after layer of fabrications pasted in Obama's BC.
The first big clue Crook.
That's not the way an image is rendered unless the image has been cut and pasted in. The dots that make up computer images don't get pasted in. They are rendered by dots into an array or matrix that are ubiquitously filled in everywhere (or sequentially from top to bottom) as the data is being read and processed by the computer and where the image becomes clearer and clearer, from a blurry image to clear, until the image gets to full resolution.
All white spaced squares and rectangles in Obama's BC are a cut and paste job. Totally fraudulent.
Ping to hoax revelation:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/02/exposed-orly-taitz-sent-stand-down.html
Update, 1:17 p.m. EST: After speaking with Atty. Taitz by phone, Carl Gallups then sent the following email to her:
Dear Ms. Taitz,
This is to advise you that I did not write the letter you have posted on your website under my name. I have never said such things, much less expressed them in a letter to you or anyone else. Furthermore, Mike Zullo has assured me that if you can provide him with the I.P. address of the letter that he has the ability to trace it down to determine the actual sender.
Carl Gallups
real “expert” in what? intellectual property? I submit nothing coming out of this WH has much intellect.
http://www.ivanzatkovich.com/home.html
Exposed: Orly Taitz Sent Stand-Down Letter; An Absolute Fabrication; Obot Tricks
After reading the letter, The Post & Email contacted Gallups to ask if he wrote and sent it, to which he responded:
I dont know what youre talking about. I have not written a letter. Neither Mike nor I have asked her to stand down. I dont know where it came from It is an absolute fabrication. I have never nor would I ever write such a letter.
Baloney
1. A birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii
It doesn’t affirm who submitted the information or when and if it was verified.
Grandma could have submitted a form “indicating” you were born in Hawaii.
There two things that struck me as being unlike Gallups.
1. The hoax Gallups said “we” would be making the reveal on March 19 and the real Gallups has always placed himself in a support role with Arpaio’s team and not included himself as being on the inside.
2. The hoax Gallups said “this Christian nation,” something that the real Gallups would never have rubbed in the nose of a Jewish woman even if he viewed the USA that way, IMO. I seem to recall Gallups referring to the USA as a Judeo-Christian-based nation.
And one of those items of information verified was "birth occurred in Hawaii." As to the function of the State Secretaries who asked and the context of their question, that ends the inquiry.
No official record has been produced.The only document produced by Hawaii is Onakas verification letter.
Actually, the COLB was "official" in that it's the document Hawaii issues for use for things like drivers' licenses, etc.
that statement is about as simple and direct an affirmation that Hawaii’s vital records indicate “Yes” as one can draft.
that statement is about as sketchy and non informative as one can draft
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.