Replies

Anyone with a smidgen of a bird brain would know that the Obama White House BC is a cut paste job.

And yet when Corsi's World News Daily went out and retained a real computer document expert, that expert's conclusion differed from yours:

[The WHLFBC] was analyzed by Ivan Zatkovich of Tampa-based eComp Consultants, which consults on intellectual property for telecommunications, web publishing and ecommerce and has provided services for corporations such as McGraw-Hill, Houghton-Mifflin, Citicorp and Amazon.com. Zatkovich has 28 years experience in computer science and document management and for more than 10 years has been an expert witness providing testimony in federal court in both criminal and civil litigation.

So did Mr. Zatkovich find evidence of "cut and paste?" Or "direct forgery?" No.

The report also addresses the white haloes around most of the printing on the document.

“It has been suggested that these ‘suspicious white borders’ indicate that items were pasted into the image. The pasting of content itself does not necessarily create a white border. A more likely reason for this halo effect is that the text was enhanced,” the report said.

“This does not mean that other content in the document was not changed. However, most of the detectable changes are consistent with someone attempting to enhance the appearance of the document rather than change the content.”

(I'm omitting the link as I can't remember offhand the policy here on linking to other sites. If someone as 'stupid' as me can find it, I'm sure others can, too.)

So, wow, someone may have gone in after scanning and done a few things to enhance legibility. That's hardly proof of "document fraud." And this comes from WND, which is as Obama-loathing a site as they come.

So did Mr. Zatkovich find evidence of "cut and paste?" Or "direct forgery?" No.

Sure OBot Zat zot could be dumber than a door nail if he really believes Obama's nonsense. Turn in his degree because he's dumb.

All those rectangular white spaces filled in with layer after layer of fabrications pasted in Obama's BC.

The first big clue Crook.
That's not the way an image is rendered unless the image has been cut and pasted in. The dots that make up computer images don't get pasted in. They are rendered by dots into an array or matrix that are ubiquitously filled in everywhere (or sequentially from top to bottom) as the data is being read and processed by the computer and where the image becomes clearer and clearer, from a blurry image to clear, until the image gets to full resolution.

All white spaced squares and rectangles in Obama's BC are a cut and paste job. Totally fraudulent.

It's not just obvious, it's horrific.

If you want to see how fake, simply download the PDF, and look at. Zoom into section 4, and look at the boxes marked '1st' and '2nd'.

So, after being hand drafted, copied to microfiche, photocopied onto security paper, and then scanned into a pdf file - those 2 boxes are a PIXEL for PIXEL exact match. IMPOSSIBLE! To even make the case stronger, the 'twin' box in section 3, is a pixel for pixel match to 'yes' in section 7g.

These are just one of MANY examples of what simply can not be in that file if it was legitimate.

Typewriter pitch doesn't line up. This was noted by Viscount Christopher Monckton of Brenchley.

Apparently whoever cobbled it together didn't think to make sure that the individual printed letters would align in the proper position as they would if such a document were typed on a type writer.

A type writer cannot place a letter in the space that would ordinarily be between two letters. That such exist on his document demonstrate it to be a fabricated lie.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/01/obamas_other_big_lie.html