[Tired of Taxes]

According to the site below, there also were bloody footprints that couldn’t have belonged to Guede. For example, this one matched Solecito:

http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/The_Bathmat_Footprint

There were other footprints, but Knox claims that her DNA must’ve mixed with the victim’s because, she says, when exiting the shower, there were no towels, so she used the bloody bathmat to slide back to her room. (Does that sound credible to you?)

http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/Luminol_Traces

Knox’s DNA was found on the knife - yes, she probably used it for cooking. But, Kercher’s DNA also was found on the knife. Solecito claimed he accidentally cut Kercher with the knife while they all were cooking dinner at his apartment, but there’s no evidence that Kercher ever went to his apartment.

The bra clasp had Solecito’s DNA on it. The defense claimed that some of that DNA could be from other people - it turns out, this claim by the defense is a stretch, but the fact that Solecito’s DNA is on the bra clasp is not disputed. More info here:

http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/The_Bra_Clasp

Again, she might be entirely innocent, but it doesn’t look that way... I can see why she was charged and eventually found guilty.

[Uncle Chip]

She took a shower — where was she supposed to step.

And I’ve done that many times just as she describes when there are no towels to keep water off the floor. So what???

All that blood in Kercher’s room and not one trace on Knox or Sollecito or their shoes or their clothes.

<> But, Kercher’s DNA also was found on the knife.<>

Here read what was found by independent forensic experts appointed by the court, Stefano Conti and Carla Vecchiotti, from Rome’s Sapienza University.

Among their conclusions — No Kercher DNA on the knife — it’s not the murder weapon.

http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/independentexperts.html