That website (themurderofmeredithkercher.com) gives more details.
Regarding DNA:
- Meredith’s DNA was found on the knife at Solecito’s apartment.
- Knox’s DNA was found mixed with Kercher’s blood in evidence found.
- Solecito’s DNA was found on Kercher’s bra hook.
Footprints:
- Footprints made in blood matched Knox and Solecito’s bare feet (but not Guede’s - so, apparently, he did not act alone.)
- A shoeprint made in blood on the pillow found under the victim’s body was made by a woman’s shoe and matched Knox’s shoe size.
As for “holding on to the murder weapon”: They had to clean it. Maybe they didn’t have time to dump it somewhere after cleaning it. Maybe they were afraid they were being watched so couldn’t dump it anywhere.
As for falsely accusing an innocent man: The police only questioned her for an hour or two before she decided that she seemed to remember being at the apartment when this other man killed the victim.
Once again... IF she and her ex-boyfriend are entirely innocent, the evidence and their behavior sure make them look guilty. This is why the case continues in Italy.
The footprints are dealt with here — all belonged to Rudy. Though he threw his bloody shoes away, the police found the box they came in at his apartment:
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/footprints-01.html
The DNA on the knife was likely a bread crumb or Amanda’s:
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/TheKnife.html
The braclasp was kicked around on the floor for 47 days before collected and when it was collected had DNA from 4 people on it. If this is so incriminating then why weren’t the other 3 people arrested and charged???
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/TheBraClasp.html
Amanda’s DNA was found in the bathroom they all shared — why wouldn’t it be there — she lived there.