Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

You could be there so you could either say why the experiment didn’t actually show anything or whether it did. Are you saying you’re scared that you couldn’t detect how they fake the demo?


408 posted on 01/20/2014 7:18:17 PM PST by Lx (Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]


To: Lx

Are you saying you’re scared that you couldn’t detect how they fake the demo?
***I think that could be a major part of what is driving modern skeptopathy in science.

Garwin & Lewis are good examples

——————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg88432.html-———————


413 posted on 01/27/2014 8:55:41 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies ]

To: Lx
You religious fanatics make me laugh.

No one was given access to the "demo," so my going there -- or anyone's going there -- would have been a complete waste of time. All we've seen is a couple of paragraphs by an "Investor" who describes a "demo" that is nothing more than Mills has shown in the past.

We are now two days after the "demo," and there is not a single reliable report of what -- if anything -- was "demonstrated" that hasn't been "demonstrated" before. Just more of the usual "Unless you've read all 1000 pages of Mills [dubious -- and highly plagiarized] tome you'll never be able to understand what he's talking about. Meanwhile, I'm writing him a big fat check."

Soapy Smith used a similar technique.

Oh wait ... there was one significant outburst of heat from Mills' demo: comments on a LENR thread sympathetic to Rossi led Dr. Mills to make this statement [since scrubbed, and then removed]

"To me e-cat is a cult. What can you say to a group that believes in thousands of watts of an unknown nuclear reaction that has no trace of radiation, and believes in a reactor where no one outside knows the identity of what it is and the one who does has been jailed for fraud?'"

That's Mills talking, not me. On the other hand, Rossi has made numerous derogatory remarks about "hydrinos;" correctly pointing out on a few occasions that if they existed the Uncertainty Principle is wrong.

Ouch. That's got to leave a mark. But please don't call me a skeptopath: I agree with both men! Each of them is a huge fraud.

To answer your original question, NOPE. Not the least bit scared of Mills, Rossi, Defkalion, or any of the other hoaxers. All I'm scared of is the prospect that taxpayer money by way of an increasingly listless, deranged DOE or NASA will end up in their pockets.

421 posted on 01/30/2014 7:52:36 PM PST by FredZarguna (Das is nicht richtig nur falsch. Das ist nicht einmal falsch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson