Posted on 01/10/2014 12:51:52 PM PST by Slings and Arrows
Have you ever been out in public, minding your own business, simply walking your dog, and people start moving to the other side of the street in fear? There are many dog breeds that don't deserve the bad rap society places upon them. Perhaps your dog is one of the breeds or mixed mutts that get a bad rap.
Dogs of certain breeds are not born dangerous by default. This, coupled with breed legislation, media focus on particular breeds, and the sensationalizing of certain incidents of attack have lead to an overall generalizing that ultimately hurts a dog, and may cost him his life.
-snip-
1. Pit Bull: Sadly, this breed has taken on more criticism and warnings than most other breeds in recent years. Often labeled as vicious, untrustworthy, and in possession of locking jaws, the Pit Bull tops our list as receiving a bad rap. According to the American Temperament Test Society, Pit Bulls ranked second in reliability overall. In other words: This original "nanny breed" is not the problem, but the way he is trained may be the issue.
(Excerpt) Read more at shine.yahoo.com ...
That could be very true.
Then try these from the CDC:
http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafety/images/dogbreeds-a.pdf
They follow the same line —
I absolutely agree. Shepherds are so intelligent. My SIL and her husband had to start spelling words around their dog...she once told me, "I swear I think he's beginning to figure THAT out, too."
My experience with Spaniels is that they have some or all of these negative qualities:
1. Dumb
2. Snappy
3. Neurotic
4. Downright goofy
Dogs in Slow Motion - 1000fps
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZIjkvdz4Ko
It happens more than you think, particularly in some of the less picky ones. GOOD shelters won’t do this, because they try to be as honest as possible, but crappier ones are just following the rules to keep em moving rather than caring about the animals and if it’s stocky or has a squarish head, pit bull it is.
I miss having a dog so much, they make life extra special.
I have a 4 yr old female rat terrier, Amy @ 15 lbs, and had been keeping my son’s 1.5 yr old 90 lb shepherd (McClane). When McClane got her mad, she would just bite him in the face. McClane is a big puppy and so in love with my son that when I dog-sit he moans in grief at being separated. He sometimes accidentally hurt Amy with his huge feet, but never, ever hurt her intentionally. She did.
Small dogs have it rough. Imagine living among people who are 20 feet tall and weigh 800 pounds when you are 5 feet tall and weigh 140. I’d be shaking and wanting to run while screaming, too.
>Pit Bulls ranked second in reliability overall. In other words: This original nanny breed is not the problem, but the way he is trained may be the issue.<
The “pit bull” is NOT the nanny breed, especially since in this country the term “pit bull” may be used to denote a given type of canine. The Staffordshire Bull Terrier holds that distinction and the 2 names are in no way interchangeable. The American Pit Bull Terrier, a UKC recognized breed, is a newer dog, while the Staffordshire Bull Terrier is an older dog breed which has its origins in Great Britain. The SBT is comparatively rare in this country and is far smaller than are most of the bull-and-terrier type dogs in the US.
If I had to bet my life on a dog, it would be a German Shepherd. A well bred well trained German Shepherd is the closest you will ever come to a human type brain in a totally loyal dog.
It’s both. Training and lack of proper training are a major part of it.
Breed specific laws are quite racist if you think about it. If someone is willing to segregate a single breed of dog for restrictive laws, they’re willing to do it for certain classes of people too.
And they have clarified the problems with the stats on p. 3 of their document: lack of proven objectivity in identifying a dog’s breed - to the point, the public has been “trained” to believe that certain breeds are more aggressive, therefore the dog that bit Uncle Charley was surely a pit bull type; lack of media objectivity (so hard to imagine that conservatives would swallow the bilge pumped out by the media day and night, but I suspect more than one “conservative” on this board has liberal tendencies on this issue); lack of discernible way to accurately assess the breed of dog — you might want to pay particular attention to that one.
HA! Merritt-Clifton?? Surprised anyone can post that as accurate....oh, wait, forgot where I am. Never mind. No, sadly, I’m not. Too many hate because the media says pit bulls kill...therefore, it must be true, right?? Right????
ROFLOL — great picture, and makes the point beautifully! Is he really yours?
Had genetic testing done on my mutt to see what he was made of.
The tests were inconclusive! Seems he is soooo mixed up they couldn’t get a clear. dominant anything. He does seem to have a lot of “primitive dog” in him, which they say is close to a Dingo, which he does look like.
Don’t ask me how we got a rescue dog with Dingo in him in New Mexico.
Of course. After all, they're so fair and accurate in reporting on conservatives.
I used to live in rural NM - I have no difficulty believing that you could find a Heinz 5700 there.
HSUS is an extremist animal rights group, and has nothing to do with local animal welfare organizations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.