Posted on 01/04/2014 3:27:05 PM PST by BenLurkin
Researchers from Michigan have scoured websites, search engine results and social networks dating back as far as 1996 in search of people who discussed select events before they happened.
They even asked time travellers from the future to tweet using a specific hashtag.
Yet despite comprehensive analysis of thousands of records, they were unable to find any evidence time travellers existed.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Exactly, the future doesn’t exist yet and the past exists only in memory.
Time Travel forward IS possible. We all do it at the rate of 1 second into the future per second.
Now, if you want to compress your travel, you merely need to get your velocity up to close to lightspeed, relative to where you want to visit the future of. That’s standard Einsteinian Mechanics, the Lorentz-Fitzgerald equation. . .
How could they find them. The travelers already knew about it before they started looking.
I was reading that the New Horizons probe has gone about .004 seconds into our future. (as perceived by us)
Well, where are the “time travelers” that are going to clean up the mess that is Obamacare? Now THERE is a project worthy of highly concentrated research and development of time travel technology, the sooner it can be undertaken and instituted, the better.
Maybe on that other timeline, Obamacare actually works.
Right.
In an INFINITY of timelines, that still wouldn’t happen.
Perhaps we live in uninteresting times.
If I had a time machine, I would go foward, not backward.
The future will be grim. Too grim.
I’d go back to before the collapse of civilization and finish out my days in pre-1960.
So they think they can find time travelers on the Internet, maybe if someone could time travel they maybe a little bit smarter the those looking!
“If time travel were ever possible I suspect it would be a one way trip forward.”
Yes I’ve heard that this is what scientists think might be possible (what’s with the Michigan guys I don’t know, I just hope we’re not paying for it). I said that here once on a similar thread and another Freeper pointed out that we’re time traveling to the future RIGHT NOW, only slowly!
27 posted on Sun Jan 05 2014 00:01:27 GMT+0000 (GMT) by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
You just have, welcome to the future. Lol.
Something I picked up about the time dilation effect about Voyager 1.
>>According to Wikipedia, the Voyager 1 spacecraft launched on September 5, 1977 and has been operating for 35 years as of 2013 and is travelling at 3.595 AU per year. To get a rough estimate on how much of a special relativistic time dilation the spacecraft has experienced let’s assume it traveled at that speed for the full 35 years (in actuality it would have been faster earlier in the flight but the speed varied up and down during all the planetary flybys).
So assuming the speed of the Voyager 1 was 3.595 AU per year for the entire 35 years, the Voyager 1 clock would have been slower by 1.8 seconds compared to a clock on Earth (see (35 years)(1-1/sqrt(1-(3.595 AU per year)^2/c^2)) ) - not a very significant effect.
However there is another effect that makes a clock on the voyager run faster - general relativity. According to general relativity, a clock that is deeper in a gravity well will run slower than a clock that is further away from the gravity well. This is the gravitational time dilation effect.
This effect would make a clock on the Earth (in the sun’s gravity well) run slower than the clock on the Voyager 1. To get a rough estimate of the effect, assume the Voyager has been at it’s current distance of approximately 125 AU for all 35 years. With that assumption, the Voyager 1 clock would be faster by 11 seconds compared to a clock on Earth (see (35 years)*((1 - 2*G*(mass of sun)/((1 AU)*c^2))^0.5-(1 - 2*G*(mass of sun)/((125 AU)*c^2))^0.5) )
So general relativity makes the clock on Voyager 1 run faster by 11 seconds but special relativity makes it run slower by 1.8 seconds - all compare to a clock on Earth.
Frank Heile, PhD in Physics from Stanford University then career in SW Eng.
did taspayers help fund this???
My friend “Mullet Man” The Oakview Time traveler, exists but due to government groups trying to capture him and his machine, he took it and himself back in time when he would be safe—1959. Why then? he said simply “I like Ike”. He said he would go to San Fernando Valley in California or Texas? I haven’t heard from him since! He said he would come back with money—but so far I haven’t seen a cent.
Which leads to the conclusion that the only reality that exists is the present moment.
In the future, one possible future, machines used by the NSA and US military gain intelligence and plot to take over the world. A war ensues as the human resistance attempts to live free of the machines like it had for eons. In order to try and prevent the rise of technology that gives way to the invention of thinking machines, men from the future come back through time to change the present. They reason that if the US economy and innovative spirit can be thwarted the machines will never be invented. Their mission, get a third world communist incompetent with real daddy issues in a position of world power and through political machinations destroy the technological and economic advances of the human race and send it spinning back to the dark ages. So far the resistance plan is working as hoped.
There would be very strict rules governing time travel.
You could look up information, but not post or otherwise transmit data NOT found in that current time frame.
You could do research in that current time frame, query for specific information, but not put up information not already present.
Flipside, in “many worlds theory”, any decision leads to a split in the timeline.
One timeline where someone took action “A”, one timeline where they did not.
So even IF you DID go back in time, you may not be in “Your” past.
You would be in the past of “alternate you”.
Now how to get home?
No such thing.
You can’t.
“Your” home timeline is now unfindable.
Congrats, you’re now lost in time.
Enjoy your stay in the current time frame.
[Pinging a bunch of writer types to help elaborate on what would govern time travel]
did tax dollars pay for this too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.