To: Yosemitest
Were is there any proof of an "Oort Cloud" ?Why, it's right there in the video I linked you to. I maintain that my source is just as valid as your source - which is predominantly BPEarthwatch - because they both ascribe to the Nibiru theory/cult/pipe dream/whatever..) Since you accept as gospel the postings of BPEarthwatch, you should embrace with open arms any and all material that is posted by his fellow true believers.
Have you been there?
Well, no I haven't. And neither have you. But my source, which is just as valid as your source believes that Herculobis and Nibiru are going to invade us from there. Since your source (again, in case you have forgotten, that would be BPEarthwatch) believes in the same things (the subject here is, as a reminder, Herculobis and Nibiru) then since you are holding to his statements (remember? ) then you are aligning yourself with his belief system. You cannot insist that he tells the truth on some subjects (like for instance astro-physics) when his cosmology is notably flawed by his underlying belief system (especially when that flawed belief system encompasses cosmology and astro-physics). Here's a sample of his aberrant teachings. Here's another. You can search his EweToob site for more at your leisure. There's plenty of celestial heresy there to keep you glued to your monitor for days as you consume more of his nutbattery.
Galatians 5:9 -A little yeast works through the whole batch of dough. (BTW - if you only understand the Bible if it is in Elizabethan English, that would be "A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.")
266 posted on
12/15/2013 9:25:03 PM PST by
NoCmpromiz
(John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
To: MD Expat in PA; Admin Moderator
I note that you have been elevated to Admin Mod as per
THIS post... ("But the admin moderator (probably you) refused to allow verifiable proof on Free Republic that the disintegrated pieces from Ison's inbound path are huge.")
So pleased to make your acquaintance.. :-) (Oh, and if you really are - don't zot the fuzzball. It's fun playing.)
Enjoy the conspiracy!
Note to Admin Mod - Courtesy ping because you were mentioned in this post, as well as the linked post where you were not given that courtesy..
267 posted on
12/15/2013 9:40:00 PM PST by
NoCmpromiz
(John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
To: NoCmpromiz
Not that I care about the "Oort Cloud" THEORY" but let's take a look at some FACTS.
From 2013 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. : Jan Hendrik Oort
" ... In 1950 Oort PROPOSED that comets originate from a vast cloud of small bodies that orbit the Sun at a distance of about one light-year, and the approach of other stars toward this cloud alters some comets orbits so that they pass close to the Sun.
The existence of this region, which was named the Oort Cloud, EVENTUALLY came to be ACCEPTED by MOST astronomers. ... "
Have we seen actual photos of it, or telescopic images of the "PROPOSED" "Oort Cloud" ?
No. We've seen computer graphics of it, or as most people like to say, MAKE BELIEVE.
Have we seen or observed by telescopes, this PROPOSED THEORY around other stars, or other "solar systems" ?
No.
Now we do have very faint actual images of
Gerard Kuiper's Kuiper Belt (
Object 1999 KR16 imaged with the University of Hawaii 2.2 meter telescope on Mauna Kea in Hawaii in April 2000. )
But like all the articles state,
"we have no direct evidence about the Oort Cloud."
Do I believe that the "Oort Cloud" is possible? Maybe.
But like so much of todays belief system, it's built off of someone's thoughts only.
I'm skeptical and awaiting confirmed proof.
I'm sick of being lied to. And the older I get, the more skeptical I get.
272 posted on
12/16/2013 6:33:48 AM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson