There's the trick: being FORCED into defending yourself.
If you'll notice; bold statements are made, but when rebuted, they are never defended; only ignored.
Normally when I answer objections to evolution, such as
DNA and RNA do not need to be the design of an intelligent being. There are cells which do not have DNA at all.
After that answer to an assertion that something must be the work of an intelligent being, the person making that assertion goes on to the next bullet on his list of baseless assertions of intelligent design/creation memes.
A little later, he will use that bullet again, despite it being already debunked. by that approach, I know he is dishonest.