Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kip Russell

>>>Since these are registered guns...

1. Send out a letter such as the one in the OP.
2. If the gun owner doesn’t comply after a short time (say, a month), contact him again and explain that if he doesn’t comply, he will be in violation of the law.
3. Shortly thereafter, show up at his doorstep (with a SWAT team as backup) and order him to turn over his property.
4. If he resists, kill him.<<<

In NYC, I think they would start with #4 and work their way back.


21 posted on 11/27/2013 7:59:37 AM PST by Above My Pay Grade (The people have the right to tell government what guns it may possess, not the other way around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Above My Pay Grade
Shortly thereafter, show up at his doorstep (with a SWAT team as backup) and order him to turn over his property.

What would be the response to a sad story about that "unfortunate boating accident last summer?"

The (former) gun-owner has committed no crime - he has merely "lost" his (until then legal) firearms (and how can you be expected to "prove" that something has been lost?).

Could a judge legally issue a search warrant, even though no crime has been committed?

Regards,

33 posted on 11/27/2013 8:49:32 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson