To: E. Pluribus Unum
The point is that he used a Wilson era free speech case, as justification for regulating guns. Would he accept the same “reasonable” restrictions on being a journalist? A training requirement? Some type of licensing? A cooling off period from the time he writes a story until it is published?
We all know the answer.
19 posted on
11/08/2013 6:59:03 PM PST by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: DesertRhino
The point is that he used a Wilson era free speech case, as justification for regulating guns. Would he accept the same “reasonable” restrictions on being a journalist? A training requirement? Some type of licensing? A cooling off period from the time he writes a story until it is published? We all know the answer. I believe he'd accept it. He appears to have a religious faith in government.
40 posted on
11/09/2013 6:52:13 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson