Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was the attack on the TSA at LAX a false flag to justify ARMING the agents? [Vanity]
November 2, 2013 | Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Posted on 11/02/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

It's all in the title, but worth considering that the attack on the TSA and the supposed 'note written by the shooter' stating he wanted to "Kill the TSA" is all a false flag for the purpose of starting a movement to arm the TSA agents. The King is always looking to grow his 'Civilian National Security Force' and the TSA is well over 50,000 strong.

We know probably over half of them couldn't even qualify to carry a firearm due to their shady pasts, but don't be surprised if calls to arm the TSA get stronger over the next few weeks. This could very well be the reason the whole thing happened in the first place.. To set the stage for arming the TSA.

The alleged note carried by the shooter is just a bit too typical of staged events and makes great propaganda for arming the TSA agents.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: agents; ciancia; domesticterrorism; lax; laxshooting; obama; ohgoodlord; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Since you bring up the subject, a facebook friend of mine posted this last night.

BUSTED! LAX False Flag Shooting Hoax Exposed!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYE20A7K9w0


41 posted on 11/02/2013 4:21:59 PM PDT by upsdriver ( Palin/West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe
Hey pal you support the 2nd or you don't. Apparently you don't..

You don't see a difference between private gun ownership and arming a paramilitary unit as part of their job. You qualify for TSA employment.

42 posted on 11/02/2013 4:22:35 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

I would not doubt that it was. I won’t say that it was, but I won’t argue that it wasn’t.


43 posted on 11/02/2013 4:23:35 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

“You support the 2nd or you don’t..despite what you say you obviously don’t.”

The federal employees having firearms is OK when the people can have them, otherwise it is just tyranny.


44 posted on 11/02/2013 4:24:00 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Not to arm the TSA but to bring Nat’l Guard in maybe?


45 posted on 11/02/2013 4:24:02 PM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

You might be on to something


46 posted on 11/02/2013 4:25:42 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elteemike

I agree. If they acknowledge that he existed, then they would have to confront him. It is easier to go into the slaughter pen blissfully in denial than to have to make painful choices to some.


47 posted on 11/02/2013 4:26:58 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

NO!


48 posted on 11/02/2013 4:27:48 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad; Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Tin foil hat or not, it certainly might be used to arm these creeps.

Every illegal act can precipitate an action. Let's remain focused on the problem rather than conspiracies.

49 posted on 11/02/2013 4:29:36 PM PDT by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

I’m not objecting to the TSA, no matter how dense they may be, to arming themselves on their own time and own dime. My objection has to doing with arming them on the taxpayer dime. Even your lowly Barney Fife in a small town has to pass that test before he gets a firearm to go with his badge. The TSA should be no different.


50 posted on 11/02/2013 4:34:49 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

My guess off the top of my head is it would cost another $100,000 in training per union TSA agent.


51 posted on 11/02/2013 4:38:19 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Training dolts to do a soldier’s job is very, very expensive. There is a reason that even the lowest position in the army won’t be offered to anyone without at least a high school education.


52 posted on 11/02/2013 4:48:37 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

No. Airports already have armed security. And really if they wanted TSA armed they’d be armed. People need to stop obsessing on false flags, it’s pathetic and stupid. Somebody read about them once and now half the people out there think every fart is a false flag, most events are just events, not tied to anything.


53 posted on 11/02/2013 4:50:10 PM PDT by discostu (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Give a gov. union another billion dollars. Brilliant! lol

Armed personnel currently in most airports include local police, airport security, sheriff’s dept. deputies, air marshals, Nat. Guard, FBI and most likely ATF agents. That's probably enough.

54 posted on 11/02/2013 4:56:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Armed personnel currently in most airports include local police, airport security, sheriff’s dept. deputies, air marshals, Nat. Guard, FBI and most likely ATF agents. That's probably enough.

It would seem that would be plenty of "security", though we know the left always demands perfection when it comes to their safety and security......at the expense of everyone else of course.

55 posted on 11/02/2013 5:01:21 PM PDT by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

If there is a need for more armed security I would think it would be better to increase one of those existing units rather than form yet another one. For both cost and response coordination considerations. Just a thought.


56 posted on 11/02/2013 5:06:17 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

” Let’s remain focused on the problem”

The TSA is a problem and them becoming armed has been an issue. They already were issued “badges”, similar to law enforcement badges, to wear on their uniforms to intimidate the people, so it isn’t stretch to think they may become armed.


57 posted on 11/02/2013 5:17:18 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
The TSA is a problem

Yes, BUT the TSA did NOT shoot up the airport killing one and wounding others.

58 posted on 11/02/2013 5:20:52 PM PDT by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

“Yes, BUT the TSA did NOT shoot up the airport killing one and wounding others. “

So? Give them guns and watch that happen!


59 posted on 11/02/2013 5:21:33 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
So? Give them guns

I never endorsed giving them guns. Do you read and comprehend what is written?

60 posted on 11/02/2013 5:25:22 PM PDT by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson