Posted on 11/01/2013 12:45:34 PM PDT by Morgana
FULL TITLE: Mother 'tried to sell daughter, FOUR, for sex to a man she had met through online prostitution ad'
A Michigan mother has been charged with offering her 4-year-old daughter for sex to a man she had met on a classifieds website.
Jennifer Brys, 25, and Edward Reardon, 26, were arraigned Wednesday on charges of child sexually abusive activity and using a computer to commit a crime.
According to investigators, Miss Brys, of Warren, placed an ad on Backpage.com last month offering her services as a prostitute.
Scroll down for video
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
HAHA :D
Understood!
Yep, even the fires of hell would not be hot enough.
Immediate sterilization. Then deportation to a ‘religion of peace’ country.
Lock them both up and throw away the key.
Part of me wonders, though — What are the odds that the girl’s father (the type of man who had a daughter with a prostitute, mind you) just happened to acquire the phone just before the crime was about to go down? It’s paranoid, of course, but that sounds more like a cover story for information acquired through telecommunication surveillance than something that actually happened.
I could have known that the female would be one of 0dumb0’s & Holder’s people!
The entrepreneurial spirit is alive in America! Rejoice!
You assume he knew she was a prostitute. He may have thought she was just running around on him only to find out this.
apparently they met through a prostitution ad online
The emphasis was meant to be on, “just happened to acquire the phone” right at that fortuitous moment just a day before the crime was supposed to take place.
I’m not saying it didn’t happen that way. I’m just pointing out that, if information were to be acquired through NSA surveillance (which we know for a fact happens) and was passed to law enforcement (which we also know for a fact happens), this is the type of cover story that would likely be offered.
Looking back at what I wrote, however, you are correct — it wasn’t right of me to make assumptions about the child’s father himself. I really wasn’t trying to but I was tired and it came out completely wrong. I guess what I was trying to get at was that one would imagine that a prostitute would be very protective of her “work phone”, particularly when there was something that incriminating on it. If the father was in a relationship with the woman without knowing she was a prostitute, he most likely wouldn’t even know it existed, not to mention be able to get his hands on it. If he were aware that the mother was a prostitute, I was somewhat surprised that he was in his daughter’s life at all, or that he allowed his daughter to be around her. The fact that he was able to get a hold of that phone, especially at that time, seemed odd to me.
Mind you, I believe that events might very well have played out like the story says — I didn’t mean to imply it was unlikely. It’s just that part of me wonders whether the tip to legal authorities came from a different source.
If I'm reading correctly, that was the molester, not the child's father.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.