It’s a political question because SCOTUS has opined the natural born citizenship definition is not specific and not justiciable. A complainant with a particularized injury can object to the laws and regulations implemented by a usurper, but the Court cannot order the removal of a usurper without a conviction of impeachment or a declaration of incompetence by the President’s cabinet.
When did SCOTUS opine thusly?
You dismiss age and residency requirements, are they political questions?
Are you saying that if a POTUS was convicted in impeachment or if his Cabinet declared him incompetent it would be the courts who would remove him from office? Which court? Who would bring the case? Where are these procedures described?