Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the_Watchman; Red Badger; GeorgeWashingtonsGhost; Moonman62
the Watchman: "All they need to do is make this statement and the notion that God designed it is disallowed!
No proof required. Ain't it wonderful how science works? "

That is, by definition, the nature of science: natural explanations for natural processes.
As soon as you say, "God did it", then you are no longer scientific.
Of course, that doesn't mean you're wrong, it only means that science itself can't go there.

And if you'll give it a little thought, you'll realize that's just the way it should be.
After all, whoever would want some scientist defining what is, or is not, God?

35 posted on 09/16/2013 10:06:33 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
And if you'll give it a little thought, the statement "this is not designed" intentionally EXCLUDES the possibility of a creating God.

And if you'll give it a little thought, the phrase "natural processes" also is a veiled attempt to EXCLUDE a creative God from the equation.

BTW: "Mother Nature" doesn't really exist either, however it conveniently sidesteps confronting the idea of a creating and sovereign GOD!

36 posted on 09/17/2013 9:57:04 AM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson