Posted on 09/03/2013 5:09:42 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
O'Reilly said tonight on his program "we have to act" and that we, The United States, are the ONLY ones that can dispense justice.
O'Reilly now interviewing McCain. Both are arguing that we need to not just lob some missiles over. They want a sustained bombing campaign.
Nope!!!!!!!
Not sure if Bolton’s for it - thinking maybe he’s not, but I remember something about Bolton saying 0 could go it alone, without Congress.
If I could have two questions answered..
What in the hell are they covering up regarding Benghazi?
There’s some SERIOUS bad stuff there.
And.. exactly what is his objective regarding these rebels taking control of Syria.
I think Obama wants Al-Queda in charge of Syria so they will become a threat to Israel.
Looks like he’s completely against it in any way, shape or form. I am pleasantly surprised.
https://www.google.com/#q=bolton+on+syria
Replace Assad’s ass, put in his place more of Morsi, who’s currently unemployed. All Eirabs look the same anyway!
I’m in favor of removing nobama, the Clown President.
EGYPTIAN NEWSPAPER’S EXPLOSIVE ALLEGATION: PRESIDENT OBAMA IS A SECRET MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MEMBER
Obama would sure just like to be President of Syria too I guess.
YEP! You got it!
Bolton said today he against this act of war.
He has said on many occasions that the President doesn’t need permission from Congress to start a war. Bolton believes the president can roam the world attacking any country he wants as long as he doesn’t declare war.
He needs to spend more time investigating loofahs and falafels.
No he sounds like he’s against a strike entirely.
With or without Congress.
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/john-bolton-syria-vote-96195.html?hp=l1_b2
O’Reilly still clings to the “0bama is a good guy” lie....
Yeah how can he even believe that or say it with a straight face.
Obama is a straight up evil, low life scum. Anyone that can’t see that is either EXTREMELY evil or EXTREMELY dumb.
Yes, he’s opposed to this strike. The reason people thought he would support it is because he thinks the President has the power to attack countries at will.
That belief does not mean he would agree with doing any of those attacks.
I am at wits end with all those that want us to go to Syria to retaliate for dead Syrians and not one person is mentioning retaliating for our dead Ambassador and troops in Libya. Their lives are totally worthless.
Why would anyone care what O’Reilly thinks?
“What in the hell are they covering up regarding Benghazi?
There’s some SERIOUS bad stuff there.”
Oh absolutely! This is all tied in.
Rand Slams Congress for Funding Egypt’s Generals:
‘How Does Your Conscience Feel Now?’
Foreign Policy | 15 Aug 2013 | John Hudson
Posted on 08/15/2013 5:44:10 PM PDT by Hoodat
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3055253/posts
Sen. Rand Paul is hammering his fellow senators for keeping billions in financial aid flowing to Egypt’s military — even as Cairo’s security forces massacre anti-government activists.
[by “anti-government activists” is meant church-burning jihadists]
Sen. Cruz Statement on Egypt (Suspend aid over anti-Muslim Brotherhood ‘coup’)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3055492/posts
Ted Cruz blames Egyptian violence on Obama’s disregard for foreign aid law
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3055589/posts
This is hysterical. BoR is against Iraq and Afghanistan but wants to get involved with Syria where there are no good guys.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.