Comment From Melissa in Texas
Bill, it seems to me that this case is interesting/different because of the way it is being presented. USUALLY, the States case is backed up with evidence, testimony, police reports, forensics, etc... and the Defenses’ position is to try to poke holes and show reasonable doubt as to the States’ case... In my opinion, this case seems to be flipped in that respect. The Defenses’ case is all corroborated by the evidence, testimony and forensics and the State is seemingly trying to poke holes and show reasonable Doubt.