Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Day 22 (Week #5) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread
The Conservative Treehouse ^ | July 10, 2013 | Sundance

Posted on 07/10/2013 5:15:07 AM PDT by Uncle Chip

Today, July 10th, is DAY #22 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.

Yesterday began with a boom as defense expert witness, world renowned Dr Vincent Di Maio took to the stand to validate the forensic evidence supporting George Zimmerman’s version of the encounter with Trayvon Martin. However, the day ended with an even bigger THUNDERCLAP in an epic 10pm showdown as Don West took on both the State prosecutors and trial Judge Nelson after the jury was released. Ending with Judge Nelson, turning her back and walking out of court. Unreal. A great analysis of the events from yesterday is available HERE.

The late night argument, not by the State, but by Judge Nelson herself, regarding phone evidence authentication, is so weak and insufferably devoid of legal analysis it is absurd on its face. Then again, this is the same judge who said a few days ago, flippantly in open court, that evidence should be “shredded” (Dr. Bao notes) after use. D’oh

Essentially Nelson argued that the phone records (texts and pics from Trayvon) cannot be authenticated to have originated by the specific personage of Trayvon Martin (despite two security codes) because anyone could have sent them. Whiskey*Tango*Foxtrot !!

How can an email be used in a sex offender case? How can phone records be used in RICO cases? How can GPS evidence be used in Insurance Cases? How are photographs taken by perps used against them? Think about it.

You can’t argue that evidence cannot be admitted because someone else might have made the actual phone call; Someone else might have physically sent the email; Someone else actually accessed the website; Someone else might have been the driver of the car; Or, someone else could possibly have been behind the viewing lens of the camera etc.

No, that argument does not mean you can arbitrarily exclude evidence. And this was the basis for her argument (watch the video).

Sure, that’s an argument which can be presented to the jury by the other side, as a counter point to create doubt with the jury, but it can’t be a reasonable consideration for total evidence exclusion. Then again, this is Judge Nelson – who in multiple prior cases has a high historical propensity of being overruled by the 5th District Court of Appeals.

It should be noted the NAACP Annual National Convention starts in Orlando on Friday; Additionally, preparations are being made in/around Miami-Dade for a Wednesday defense wrapped up with a community/LEO preparation meeting yesterday.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: george; georgezimmerman; trayvon; trayvonmartin; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 2,381-2,382 next last
To: mountaineer1997

This guy is a total jerk. That’s a standard expert witness fee. I use to work in a firm and you should see expert DOCTOR witness fees.


561 posted on 07/10/2013 8:06:59 AM PDT by JPX2011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

According to Guy, only government employees deserve to be paid.


562 posted on 07/10/2013 8:07:42 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I get paid between $20 and $125 hour.

$1500 fee.

First time he’s testified in court.


563 posted on 07/10/2013 8:07:47 AM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: All
Prosecutor:

You've never killed anyone, so your testimony is worthless.

564 posted on 07/10/2013 8:08:51 AM PDT by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Thank you


565 posted on 07/10/2013 8:08:52 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

Prosecution spinning their wheels with this witness.


566 posted on 07/10/2013 8:09:02 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: JPX2011

OK - we have it on the record that neither this officer nor Serino ever discharged their weapon in the line of duty.


567 posted on 07/10/2013 8:09:09 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Persecution pointing out that Root has never been personally involved in an officer related shooting. Never killed anyone. As though this is a bad thing.


568 posted on 07/10/2013 8:09:11 AM PDT by NautiNurse (Now we all have Obama phones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Sort of a Dali-esque moment there when his female staff member walked by carrying a blow-up doll under her arm....


569 posted on 07/10/2013 8:09:45 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: JPX2011

He reminds me of a snotty know-it-all 17-year-old on a high school debate team. Utterly nasty in a childish way.


570 posted on 07/10/2013 8:09:54 AM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: JPX2011

Please don’t use the Lord’s name as an expletive!....This is not appreciated at Free Republic


571 posted on 07/10/2013 8:09:55 AM PDT by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

They’re using GZ effin language every chance they get. Meanwhile it’s unlikely given the ruling by Nelson that we’ll ever hear all of TM’S mock etc.

Prosecution getting zinged by the witness. .LOL


572 posted on 07/10/2013 8:10:04 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Thank you


573 posted on 07/10/2013 8:10:04 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: 101stAirborneVet

Egads!


574 posted on 07/10/2013 8:10:20 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

I wish Joe would do a screen shot of the blow up doll


575 posted on 07/10/2013 8:10:47 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: All

576 posted on 07/10/2013 8:11:26 AM PDT by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

Of course. My apologies.


577 posted on 07/10/2013 8:11:31 AM PDT by JPX2011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Comment From ozzk
Is the witness a character expert, a firearms expert, a LE expert, a self-defense expert, or just sympathetic towards the defense?


578 posted on 07/10/2013 8:11:35 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 575 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

MoM and West look confident.


579 posted on 07/10/2013 8:11:49 AM PDT by txmissy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

This is what I worry about too.


580 posted on 07/10/2013 8:12:09 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 2,381-2,382 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson