Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I don’t agree with RT news, but certainly not with the Unofficiality of Martial Law in Boston and people allowing it. If they had come with an official warrant, it would have been discussed, but “nothing to see here” approach is disgusting. The dudes would have been caught. There was no further urgency needed. A response is needed during an invasion or when key industrial infrastructures are being destroyed. I don’t think a Marathon charity event qualifies here. Funny thing is the IRS attacks on churches and key infrastructures of speech are not seen as requiring martial law against the IRS or civil government, when it should be considered.


5 posted on 05/21/2013 11:42:26 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lavaroise; All
The sheer volume of firepower they use is mind boggling, it's amazing that the collateral damage isn't higher, or maybe we just aren't being told about it.

I just don't believe in pulling a trigger unless I have a solid sight picture.

9 posted on 05/21/2013 11:58:54 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson