Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DogByte6RER

It would be a lot cheaper & more effective to put in trailcams.


16 posted on 05/08/2013 8:40:39 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

“It would be a lot cheaper & more effective to put in trailcams.”

But drone IR data might locate grass patches. Just think of the ramifications of that amongst the Academented.


18 posted on 05/08/2013 8:46:50 PM PDT by GladesGuru (Islam is antithetical to, and Islam is irreconcilable with, America. Therefore - Islam Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

at least it’s not spying on icebergs with CIA satellites to monitor “global warming”.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2423500/posts


19 posted on 05/08/2013 9:01:47 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

The drone IR location will provide locations to plce the trail cameras

Given the areas to be searched it can be argued that narrowing down the trails on which to put cameras is an effective strategy.

Justifying the cost is not going to be an easy task however


36 posted on 05/09/2013 4:29:36 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson