I've been voting for the lesser of two evils for a long time. I think that's how I got Obama. Twice.
Markey is bad. Gomez is bad. Which is better? I don't know and I don't care. I don't vote for Liberals, so this election is of no interest to me. I voted for Sullivan in the primary. I didn't like him either, but he was the most conservative of the three Republicans. Turns out Gomez won the primary.
I'll stay home for the general election. The liberals own this country now -- but I won't encourage them by voting for one of them.
Unlike Malarkey, Gomez at least has some significant experience working in the dreaded private sector. Also, this would be Gomez's first political office. Markey has held elective office continuously since 1973. This is not to say Gomez is anything other than an unprincipled RINO wannabe whose only goal is his own advancement.
I, too, voted for Sullivan, but without much enthusiasm. He lost, and Gomez won, with 51%. Sigh. But, nevertheless, it would be great to see Malarkey lose an election!
bump
the lesser of two evils is still an evil
do not waste time or effort or money supporting lftist RINO’s, spend your efforts on races where conservatives are running