You know, if you want to argue in favor of a Constitutional amendment, it’s possible you might get further. A little bit further, at least. Because I think you can rationally argue that your position is “advisable.”
But that’s not what this discussion is about. This discussion is about HISTORY and LAW. It is about what the Founding Fathers DID, and what the law IS.
And that’s clear. They made no such requirement as you claim they did.
Don't need to. Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution backs up my reading of the Framers' intent completely.
I'm afraid it's you who should seek a constitutional amendment to change the NBC requirement, so your boss is eligible to hold office.