Replies

Much like the LOLcats, Jeff haZ a confuzed. In his determination to make us look like fools, he forgot one small detail.

You see, Jeff, like every other lib troll on FR actually thinks that you and I are capable of being shamed over things like ‘facts’.

In Jeff’s world, they are mallable things where officially deputized posses are filled with conspirators and the sherrifs they serve are doddering old fools who risk lifetime careers to make up stories about those vile, evil and disgusting ‘black people’ because of deep seated racism.

In reality of course, liberals like Jeff display a particularly disgusting brand of racism. They work endlessly to help ensure that a thrice birth certificated pResident continues on in office, increasing the black unemployment numbers by the day. He helps make sure that more black children die at the hands of monsters like Gonsel the abortionist, who the rEaident blesses in the name of God in public venues. He helps liquidate those horrible black people from the streets of cities like Chicago through supporting the legitimacy of a rEsident that passes rule after law to keep them self eradicating.

So when a piece of human garbage like Jeff comes on to this site posting volumes of nonsense, I feel nothing but anger that my fellow conservatives do not band together and tell him just how vile and pathetic a thing he is.

Jeff? Why do you hate black people? Explain the 3 birth certificates Jeff and help us put an end to the racist monster in the White House.

Unless you WANT him there....

Wow. That is simply the BEST ad-hominem screed I've read in a long time. Congratulations! You have a talent, Norm.

I looked for some kind of award to give you, but all I could come up with was this:

Except... in this case, stupid ad-hominem attacks doesn't silence the opposition. It only illustrates the fact that you lost the argument, because the facts aren't on your side.

Let me give you a CLUE, Norm.

If you want to make your case, you have to make it from the FACTS.

I know this is hard for you to grasp, Norm. But maybe you can get it if you try really, really hard.

You claim it takes birth on US soil plus two citizen parents for a person to be a natural born citizen.

I've produced some 30 quotes from the assembled legal authorities of early America (1787 up to 1850) which say it takes no such thing.

These are from such authorities as:

Father of the Constitution James Madison
important Founder and Framer Alexander Hamilton (without whom we might very well not have our Constitution)
our first Congress (which included six signers of the Constitution)
the Massachusetts State Legislature
the Duc de la Rochefoucauld (who was a personal friend of Benjamin Franklin)
prominent Connecticut legal expert Zephaniah Swift
St. George Tucker (who was one of our very top early legal experts, and who wrote "the most popular reference work for students and practitioners of United States law until the mid-19th century")
the Marquis de Lafayette (who served under Washington in the Revolutionary War and was a close friend of every one of our first six Presidents [George Washington, James Madison, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, and John Quincy Adams])
respected legal scholar and judge Chancellor James Kent
top Constitutional expert William Rawle (who was extremely close to both Franklin AND Washington, who held meetings with them in the months leading up to the Constitutional Convention, and was in Philadelphia while the Convention was taking place)
legal legend Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story
and various other court cases, judgments, and legal authorities including New York Vice Chancellor Lewis Sandford, who analyzed American citizenship exhaustively before asking, "Suppose a person should be elected President who was native born, but of alien parents, could there be any reasonable doubt that he was eligible under the constitution?" and declaring, in answer, "I think not."

You know. All those guys you call "liberals?"

So let me give you a CLUE, Norm. If you want to make an argument, you need to actually... you know, make an argument? You need to produce some actual facts on YOUR side, rather than engage in stupid, idiotic ad-hominem attacks.

Because all the ad-hominem attacks do is illustrate that you've lost the argument.

You can't, of course. Because, as you probably know, people like DiogenesLamp have scraped the ground down to the bare rock trying to come up with stuff to support your claim. And all they've come up with is bullcrap.

I'll give you another clue, Norm. This one is free.

When you scrape the ground as hard as you can to try and find support for your claim, and all you come up with is bullcrap, that's a pretty sure sign that your argument is completely, totally, absolutely wrong.

At that point, the smart people tuck their tails between their legs and slink away. The dumb ones stay attached to their precious bogus theory and just keep digging themselves in deeper and deeper.

Explain the 3 birth certificates Jeff and help us put an end to the racist monster in the White House. Unless you WANT him there....

Normie, I asked JW Fogblower what he thought about the three birth certificates some posts back, and he replied with a haughty harrumph.

Like all liberals, when the facts expose his side's corruption, he gets angry and spits at the question and the questioner. Typical lib reaction, and yet another evasion on his part.

Your last question to him hangs in the air ... how will he reply? I don't believe I've ever seen him express any sort of solidarity with the conservative view of The Usurper. I personally believe that Jeff works for Obama, and is loathe to say anything negative about him. It's why he defends his right to sit on the throne.