Skip to comments.
Amateur with metal detector finds 1,600-year-old royal ring
Fox News ^
| Mar 28, 2013
Posted on 03/30/2013 5:04:33 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
Edited on 03/30/2013 5:07:38 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
Did this intricate piece of sapphire, gold and glass belong to the King of France, some 1,600 years ago?
A group of archaeologist met at the Yorkshire Museum in England last week to discuss the Escrick Ring, an intricately worked gold ring surrounding a brilliant blue sapphire discovered in 2009 by an amateur metal-detector enthusiast.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: escrickring; france; godsgravesglyphs; metaldetecting
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator
To: Jet Jaguar; SunkenCiv
With the proceeds, he will be able to get his teeth whitened. (Groaner alert!)
2
posted on
03/30/2013 5:06:27 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Commies out of DC!" --Raoul Deming, 1954-2013)
To: Jet Jaguar
One Ring To Rule Them All.
3
posted on
03/30/2013 5:06:31 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Albion Wilde
...wasn’t it a few months back that another metal detector found jewelry from the middle ages?
4
posted on
03/30/2013 5:17:08 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Albion Wilde
I used to work with a guy who was constantly finding really neat things with his metal detector. I know he had found and returned several class rings.
I thought it sounded like fun and in 1986 bought a nice Whites. I guess I never did get really good with it as I never found anything other than some coins, a pocket knife and a few other odds and ends. None of the coins were valuable.
5
posted on
03/30/2013 5:30:03 PM PDT
by
yarddog
(Truth, Justice, and what was once the American Way.)
To: Albion Wilde
It's clear from the article that the ring was found in Yorkshire, in the north of what is today England. In the fifth century (i.e. 1,600 years ago) that area was in transition from Roman to Romanized Britons' rule. The legions left around 410. If the ring was made in (what is now) France around that time it was most likely a Briton with connections to the Continent who brought it to Yorkshire. There was no "King of France" at that time.
It is good to know that British journalists can be as historically ignorant as their American counterparts. Well, nearly.
6
posted on
03/30/2013 5:31:23 PM PDT
by
katana
(Just my opinions)
To: Jet Jaguar

looks more like a Queens ring... but then again, they say it's French
7
posted on
03/30/2013 5:37:22 PM PDT
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: katana
I am sure the Franks or maybe it was the Gauls had kings back then. We may just no know who they were.
8
posted on
03/30/2013 5:50:29 PM PDT
by
yarddog
(Truth, Justice, and what was once the American Way.)
To: Albion Wilde
“With the proceeds, he will be able to get his teeth whitened. (Groaner alert!)”
You mean he can’t just walk into a dentist and get that done for nothing? Don’t they have free health care there?
</sarc>
9
posted on
03/30/2013 5:53:47 PM PDT
by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
To: Jet Jaguar
5th or 6th century? About the time the Saxons left england or shortly after.
10
posted on
03/30/2013 7:24:27 PM PDT
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: yarddog; katana
"I am sure the Franks or maybe it was the Gauls had kings back then. We may just no know who they were."
True. The Gauls were organized enough to sack Rome shortly before the beginning of the 5th Century, which was not long before the Saxons left England.
11
posted on
03/30/2013 7:33:31 PM PDT
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: Albion Wilde
12
posted on
03/30/2013 7:44:00 PM PDT
by
Lockbar
(Quality Factory Loaded Ammunition ------- The New Gold)
To: yarddog; katana
Oops...sorry. Here’s a correction of my error.
True. The Gauls were organized enough to sack Rome long before the beginning of the 5th Century, which was quite long before the Saxons left England—roughly 800 years. I was way off.
13
posted on
03/30/2013 7:55:47 PM PDT
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: familyop
More like chieftains really, but they undoubtedly called themselves "Kings". The Merovingians were the first to rule a Frankish kingdom and that did begin in the late 5th century. But they weren't "Gauls" by that time. The Franks were Germanic and not Celtic. The true Gauls sacked Rome in 390
BC. Which the Romans never forgot and finally avenged totally under Julius Caesar.
Begs the question, though, about how a supposed Frankish ring made its way to and was buried or lost in the Saxon area that one day became known as Yorkshire (a Danish name). The history of Britain in those times is hard to decipher with various continental peoples invading and overrunning each other. Each successive one changed the language and culture leading eventually into what we can now call "English".
14
posted on
03/30/2013 8:00:15 PM PDT
by
katana
(Just my opinions)
To: familyop
I think you mean left for England from Saxony (the North of what is now Germany). The Angles, another Germanic group, migrated around the same time, hence the name Anglo Saxon. Then the Danes and a smattering of Norwegians, the Normans (Viking stock who were settled in the northwest of France to be kept happily away from sacking Paris). For around 600 years England was the Grand Central Station of really bada** fellows with axes and swords.
15
posted on
03/30/2013 8:09:11 PM PDT
by
katana
(Just my opinions)
To: katana
Thank you. True about trying to decipher history during those times. I’ve only managed to take time to read a few accounts as related by English locals to monks long after events, to read from a few studies and the like. More than a little rusty, too. And yes, accounts and names varied from place to place and language to language (being so varied to this day).
16
posted on
03/30/2013 9:12:31 PM PDT
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: Lockbar
17
posted on
03/30/2013 9:27:44 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Commies out of DC!" --Raoul Deming, 1954-2013)
To: Albion Wilde; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; decimon; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; ...
18
posted on
03/31/2013 6:25:53 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
To: dfwgator
Lost! My Precious is lost!
19
posted on
03/31/2013 1:35:30 PM PDT
by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: Albion Wilde; SunkenCiv
Wow, it's in great shape. Really beautiful.
There is some speculation that after the withdrawal of the Legions York became the seat of a kingdom of Ebruac, after the Roman name for York. It collapsed in the invasions from Germany. Just because the ring was made in Gaul doesn't mean it necessarily was owned by an official located there.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson