Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Longbow1969

Exactly so - the assumption is that by being full on pro-abort, pro-gay marriage and pro-dope that this will lead to the salvation of the Republican party.

Seen it. I also don’t believe that ‘libertarians’ are even interested in passing spending cuts either. If you’re willing to compromise on social issues, then what’s stopping you from compromising on spending issues too?


44 posted on 01/20/2013 3:18:44 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge
What do you mean by pro-dope? Are you equating support of drug use with those who simply are against the unconstitutional Drug War? A Drug War that is a total, complete, and utter failure? A Drug War that increases the power of all of the FedGov's jackboot agencies?

I don't see how it's Constitutional to support things that are clearly outside of the enumerated powers. I don't recall reading my thing about plants, narcotics, and hallucinogens in Article 1 Section 8.

52 posted on 01/20/2013 3:28:16 PM PST by GunRunner (***Not associated with any criminal actions by the ATF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson