Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Labyrinthos
“””””The SCOTUS decisions that support the political question doctrine go back to the founding of our Country — long before the start of the Republican Party. This is less partisan than you may want to think.””””

Blah Blah Blah.....
All I know is that since 1998 several capable attorneys on our side, using various legal strategies, have attempted to convince different courts to hear the eligibility issue on its merits.... Each and every time there is some complex technical reason sited why the case can not go forward. The judges just find a way to dismiss it. So one of two things is correct; either the system itself is flawed and by default conspires against justice or the system is being manipulated by clever political hacks with an agenda. I tend to believe the later. Using complex legal technicalities to avoid hearing an issue in court can and is almost always argued. However, most times the case goes forward, a ruling is made and the technical issues are dealt with later on appeal. All we want is our day in court!!! Please

117 posted on 01/12/2013 1:02:06 AM PST by Constitution 123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Constitution 123

And all the while, the judges do blatant things, like Robertson ruling to Hemenway that thousands of dollars did not meet the $500 threshold (not enough is at stake in Obama’s illegal usurpation) and then saying Obama’s eligibility has already been decided on Twitter... like Judge Carter hiring an aide from the company representing Obama in the middle of a court case against Obama and right before totally reversing his manner and everything he had previously said.... like Judge Malihi deciding a case based on “judge’s knowledge” because no evidence was offered - and then refusing to certify the results so Obama’s contempt of court could not be charged to him and his lawyers.... like the judge in FL telling Klayman that even though he has standing the case will be dismissed because Obama has been “acting as President” for the last 3+ years... like Kagan and Sotomayor refusing to recuse themselves from a case in which their own jobs were at stake.... like SCOTUS deciding that the eligibility of the man who would hold the nuclear football is not as important as whether manufacturers put sugar in drinks... like the appeals court in GA (after Malihi) not allowing the plaintiff to file papers and the appeals judge finally ruling on a motion the plaintiff had not yet been allowed by the support staff to make...

It is very, very clear that the system has been taken over by thugs. Probably using the same Soros threats that got Roger Ailes to tell his employees that he would get people to kill or injure them if they reported on Obama’s eligibility (and it wasn’t FCC or FEC annihilation as Ailes claimed to his people, because simply reporting the threat to Bush’s FBI/DOJ could have eliminated that threat).

The judges’ actions are maddening, but I believe they are intended to be so, as red flags to tell the world that they are acting under duress. No legitimate lawyer in the country would accept these behaviors; they are the behaviors for a banana republic, not a free country. Any lawyer who accepts the above behaviors is instantly recognized as part of the mafia that enabled this coup. It’s really that simple.


119 posted on 01/12/2013 4:36:13 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson