Skip to comments.
FOR THE CHILDREN; Mandatory Concealed Carry Beretta 93 Raffica For Everyone
http://www.berettaweb.com/93R/Beretta%2093R%201.htm ^
| December 18, 2012
| yosemitest
Posted on 12/18/2012 2:25:53 PM PST by Yosemitest
While Obama and the Democrats are sealing us blind with over Sixteen Trillion Dollars of debt pilled upon our children,
now they want to take away our RIGHT to defend ourselves, with "gun control", yet they refuse to defend our children by arming our teachers.
So it's time that Concealed Carry of the Beretta Model 93 Raffica machine pistol become every United States Citizen's RIGHT.
No longer will we have to wait for an unbearable time for government officials to defend our children and watch them die, while waiting for socialists government officials to show up after the murder has finished his EVIL deed.
Yes, the Beretta Model 93 Raffica machine pistol will assist every parent, every responsible citizen DO what the government will NOT DO, and that is PROTECT OUR CHILDREN.
The time has come to put a stop to government abuse of our children and us, too.
Introduce legislation NOW, to make it mandatory for every laws abiding citizen to Conceal-Carry the Beretta Model 93 Raffica machine pistol.
< /sarcasm>
i
TOPICS: Education; Society
KEYWORDS: forthechildren; guncontrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Let the fun begin!
To: Yosemitest
You really must have a screw loose. The Beretta 93 is not controllable by those not familiar with the gun. At best it's a spray and pray weapon and would place children in danger. Secondly that weapon is outlawed by the 1934 FDR Gun Control Law.
I'd prefer it, if there were one or two responsible people placed in schools that would be prepared to protect children being capable of using ultimate force if deranged people came to harm them. I'd settle for a guard carrying a Model 92 Beretta.
2
posted on
12/18/2012 2:46:12 PM PST
by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: Yosemitest
Pass the old bounty laws and criminals could become a harvest-able resource.
3
posted on
12/18/2012 2:50:58 PM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."..)
To: Yosemitest
A good 1911 would be much more appropriate, and that’s not up for debate heh.
4
posted on
12/18/2012 2:53:15 PM PST
by
Bulwyf
To: Yosemitest
I would prefer to carry my Springfield Xd .40 cal.
As cool as automatic weapons are, I prefer to use carefully placed shots. When at the range I shoot for the tightest groupings possible.
I see other folks popping off rounds as fast as they can with various semi auto weapons, but I was not trained to shoot that way, so I don’t.
But yeah, the answer is more guns. The answer is most certainly not less or no guns.
People who caryy though need to be trained on how to most effectively use their weapon.
I also see no reason why people should not be allowed to carry visible, large fixed blade combat knives.
5
posted on
12/18/2012 3:02:40 PM PST
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: Doc91678
From a
review The 93R was designed in the early 1970s and meant for military and police use, offering extraordinary firepower in a small pistol.
It is ideal for concealed carry purposes such as close quarters fighting, VIP protection, and room-to-room searches.
A foldable foregrip and a selector switch on the firearm allows the pistol to fire three round bursts with each pull of the trigger for a full potential cyclic rate of 1100 rpm.
The designers of the 93R limited it to three round bursts to allow the weapon to be more easily controlled.
The 93R is essentially a Beretta 92 series pistol (the Beretta 92FS is termed "M9" by the US military, and is the standard issue pistol for the US Army).
But the 93R firearm is single action and outfitted with a direct muzzle brake, an optional detachable shoulder stock and an equipped 20-round magazine that also allowed for a firmer grip.
If you don't like it, try the
Mini Uzi 9mm Machine Pistol.
6
posted on
12/18/2012 3:05:51 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Bulwyf
A good 1911 would be much more appropriate, and thats not up for debate heh. The 1911 in ACP is just about the best concealed carry weapon in terms of stopping power. A good one is accurate, reliable, and comfortable all day, although I don't like to shoot more than 30 rounds in a day. Note: This little toy also has stopping power, but overpenetration is a potential issue, and it can be awkward to carry in some situations:
7
posted on
12/18/2012 3:08:00 PM PST
by
Pollster1
(Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
To: chris37
Okay I’ll go along with the Springfield XDM in .40 cal.I lived out West in Montana during the 1950’s where open cary was permissible. I have no problems with that. I had a CCP for most of my adult life and have yet to use it to protect myself or others. Although I did do a stint in the military, but that’s a horse of a different color.
8
posted on
12/18/2012 3:12:24 PM PST
by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: Bulwyf
9
posted on
12/18/2012 3:13:20 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Pollster1
10
posted on
12/18/2012 3:15:32 PM PST
by
Carriage Hill
(Don't whiz on the electric fence. Awwwww-yeah!)
To: Yosemitest
A good M1911 .45ACP is all that is needed. Anything else for close defense is overkill.
To: carriage_hill
Ouch! I think that would be a fun toy, but I don’t live in the right area for it to serve a real purpose. I may buy one if Pelosi and Obama are trying to ban it, but otherwise, I can’t see getting one.
12
posted on
12/18/2012 3:21:14 PM PST
by
Pollster1
(Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
To: vetvetdoug
13
posted on
12/18/2012 3:21:55 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Pollster1
Besides, I LIKE overkill !
14
posted on
12/18/2012 3:22:38 PM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Pollster1
Haha, yes that one could be a problem for going through a bit too much.
At .50 cents a pop, it’s expensive to shoot .45, I can see why more than 30 a day would be troublesome.
15
posted on
12/18/2012 3:43:07 PM PST
by
Bulwyf
To: Yosemitest
You keep your little toys away from me! Heh, actually I just don’t like how they handle and feel.
16
posted on
12/18/2012 3:44:35 PM PST
by
Bulwyf
To: Bulwyf
At .50 cents a pop, its expensive to shoot .45, I can see why more than 30 a day would be troublesome. Most of my shooting is .22 so I don't beat up my hands, my ears, and my wallet, but I try for 5 rounds a day of .45, just so I don't flinch at the noise or get startled by the kick. Once or twice a month though, I'll shoot 30 rounds of .45 at one go, and it's a lot of fun.
17
posted on
12/18/2012 5:25:21 PM PST
by
Pollster1
(Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Pollster1
what kick? my kimber .45 is so nicely balanced, I can fire hundreds in a day and not notice. Maybe some are weighted differently, but mine shoots nice. It’s just the cost that’s a deterrent.
I actually would like to get the .22 conversion kit for it so I can use it for much cheaper too heh.
19
posted on
12/18/2012 5:52:50 PM PST
by
Bulwyf
To: Yosemitest
Why not just build a kevlar lined safe room in each classroom? Or have several in position around the school, one way bulletproof glass and no way to gain access if its locked from within.
I can think of a way to build portable units of ballistic material that literally just snap together, ideally it would be something capable of taking multiple heavy hits from at least 30cal. When a shooters alarm is triggered in a school students go to the nearest ballistic shelter.
20
posted on
12/18/2012 5:54:11 PM PST
by
Eye of Unk
(A Civil Cold War in America is here, its already been declared.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson