It’s Time To Repeal The 2nd Amendment

"Homebrewed Theology" ^ | December 14, 2012

[sassy steel magnolia]

what an odd coincidence! We live on a lake also, and it’s always murky cuz it’s a “run of the river lake” (dams at north and south ends). But it’s great for crappie and bass and catfish!

Yeah, the bottom of the lake is all muck fer sure. I hate swimming in it cuz I can’t see thru the water and when I have touched the bottom it’s just gross. Even around our boathouse it’s murky, and I hate cleaning around the pilings!

We’ve lost anchors, knives, expensive sunglasses, and a cooler in the lake. So, yeah, if they ever dry up the lake it will be amazing what they find! :)

[elcid1970]

Amending the Constitution is simple & easy, Homejob.

Especially getting thirty-eight state assemblies to ratify a proposed amendment. A breeze..........

;^)

[Red Steel]

Based on the English Bill of Rights (1869), as the US Supreme Court has said, the English law was to reinstate Protestant‘s rights to have arms after being disarmed by James II. The American cousin was no doubt influenced by both the English law and the conditions of occupation by the British military leading up to the American Revolution.

Some influence is certainly not the same laws. The American Revolution was to throw off the yoke of English law and make a new country with its OWN distinct laws. We see the Libtard doesn't cite the founders closer to the adoption of the Bill of Rights to the US Constitution.

"Alexander Hamilton explained in 1788:

If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude[,] that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens"

The intent of the law was to prevent the government from militarily taking over the nation. This was back in the days where the citizenry and the government had access to pretty much the same weaponry.

Not quite correct libtard. That's why down through history from muskets to AR platforms have been available to the public. The intent of the 2nd Amendment was and still is a last resort against dictatorial tyranny regardless which instruments is used, military or civilian brown shirts, to illegally oppress and seize total power.

[Ohioan]

Additionally, since the Civil War, there really hasn’t been much in the way of a tyrannical government to fear. Sure RWNJs and Tea Partiers like to claim that this (or really any Democratic administration in the last 50 years) are putting the US on the road to tyranny, you and I both know they’re full of s**t.

Note that this statement is precisely opposite to the facts. Prior to the Civil War, there really wasn't much in the way of tyrannical Government--disagreements to be sure, but very little overreaching by the Federal Government. After the Civil War, we have seen an ever greater Federal encroachment into areas never given to the Feds in the Constitution.

Of course the advocates of tyranny never admit to being advocates of tyranny. Lenin, Trotsky, Hitler & Castro were just trying to help their respective victims realize their potential, to hear their propagandists explain it all.

William Flax

[Albion Wilde]

The fact that stuck out for me in the reporting was that the father had divorced the mother in 2008 and was “living nearby in a community of multi-million dollar homes with his new wife.” That’s cold.

If ever a boy needed a father in the home, it was a highly intelligent, autistic boy. Didn’t he understand how disruptive his actions would be for an already troubled child? Couldn’t he at least have stayed until the kid was grown and settled in some kind of job or halfway house?

[bigfootbob]

I have a son-in-law that is a Marine. He and all of the Marines I’ve met would take out Obama before they fired on citizens. This you can count on.

[Signalman]

This could be the wake-up call for the Right. If the libs try to abolish the 2nd amendment, 2014 will make 2010 pale in comparison.

[ThunderSleeps]

This guy is ignorant beyond belief. Lets take just a couple of examples out:

The intent of the law was to prevent the government from militarily taking over the nation.

If you think tyranny by your own government is impossible, you're shockingly naive. Read history sometime. Really read it - it's not just a class you cut in HS, it has real value at teaching us lessons about human nature.

In 2012, well, let’s just say that your personal arsenal wouldn’t be much of a match for Marines with BDMs or a Naval Carrier Group with fully loaded warplanes.

Please explain Vietnam, the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s, etc. How well did these kind of engagements work out for the big high-tech armies?

Additionally, since the Civil War, there really hasn’t been much in the way of a tyrannical government to fear.

How many czars does obama have now? How many executive orders has he issued. How much government by fiat? If you don't fear what the government is becoming under obama you are a fool.

Sure RWNJs and Tea Partiers like to claim that this (or really any Democratic administration in the last 50 years) are putting the US on the road to tyranny, you and I both know they’re full of s**t.

When you stop drinking the kool-aid and come to your senses I may, may accept your apology.

[Dead Corpse]

Wrong.

[semaj]

The rank opportunism on display by these fascists makes me want to puke. To me, it looks like the makings of a civil war.

[Travis McGee]

Here are some recent images I like to toss to the liberals on the 2nd Amd. Most folks today are visual learners, and these images are effective for those who may not grasp paragraphs of prose.

[plain talk]

Liberals won’t fight this head-on. They don’t need to. They will patiently achieve it via death by a 1000 cuts. Same way they will institute communism.

[Perseverando]

Some resources on school threats for consideration. (There’s some old news here, but evil, terrorism and massacres never go out of style.)

Terrorists – coming to a school near you
Police ill-equipped to defend against an American Beslan
WND
Published: 04/02/2007 at 1:00 AM

Note: Killology Research Group website does not seem to still be actively updated.

Mass Slaughter In Our Schools: The Terrorists' Chilling Plan?
By Chuck Remsberg
Senior PoliceOne Contributor

School Safety Notes and Articles About School Safety by Col. Grossman
Preventing School Violence
School Shooting Contingency Plans & Considerations
”Preparing for School Attacks" published in The Police Marksman

School Safety Notes, Articles, And Links About School Safety by Other Authors
Rise in 'shool terror attacks' - New Important Article
A School Lockdown/Emergency Drill Success Story
Rapid Response/Active Shooter Lesson Plan
Safe 2 Tell

[DPMD]

Someone help me here. Does the Constitution specifically say that the Government is entitled to have guns? Can Bloomberg explain why thee are so many guns in the government at every level?

[muawiyah]

it's somewhat feasible. The red/blue county level distinction shows that the Democrats are already tied up in urbanized regions ~ and are clearly isolated from the broad masses who live in the Republican areas.

Chain link fence can probably be produced in sufficient quantity to surround those areas and you only need 8 ft heights to keep the majority of folks inside.

Then, do a little house to house to take away their guns ~ and that'll eliminate virtually all the mass murders, as well as drop the armed robbery rate through the basement.

[DPMD]

“To own a gun in Norway...” blah, blah, blah.

And yet, in prison in Norway, we have someone who found a way to kill more than 80. With guns. And, adding to the PC insanity, for a maximum sentence of only 20 years, the absolute most any crime can fetch in that country.

The liar who wrote this article knows that once the 2nd Amendment is repealed, none of the following measures he describes will follow. How stupid does he want us to be?

Maybe, for starters, he can explain why any government at any level should have any guns at all.

[2111USMC]

An article I read earlier stated that the father was devastated by the divorce.

It wasn’t HIS doing.

[CodeToad]

Typical liberal author. Nothing but mean-spirited name calling and a belligerent response to ban guns. The author’s “Lord and Savior” Obama, mmm mmmm mmmmm, has killed ten times as many people with his illegal gun running to Mexican drug lords than this school just experienced.

[norwaypinesavage]

"The intent of the law was to prevent the government from militarily taking over the nation. This was back in the days where the citizenry and the government had access to pretty much the same weaponry. In 2012, well, let’s just say that your personal arsenal wouldn’t be much of a match for Marines with BDMs or a Naval Carrier Group with fully loaded warplanes."

I agree there is such a problem with the second amendment. However, it can be fixed with a simple amendment. The constitution needs to allow private ownership of nuclear devices. I'm sure, had the Founding Fathers anticipated nuclear bombs, private ownership of them would have been written into the constitution.

[Bshaw]

Why is it after someone is fatally stabbed, there are no news stories on the manufacturer of the knife?