Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nate Silver just covered his A**
Twitter ^ | 11/04/12 | Tom Riker

Posted on 11/04/2012 10:56:56 AM PST by Tom Riker

We have Obama as ~80% likely to win Electoral College if popular vote is a tie. 98% if it's O+1. 30% if it's R+1.

30 percent IF its R+1? really? so you basically drop 68 points and a romney win if the only thing changes is O goes from tie turnout to plus r 1?

Pew, Gallup and Rassmussen show turnout at R + 1-3 points...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: election; natesilver; obama; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: gswilder

And if Nate is proved wrong, he will blame the polls. ‘Hey I was just working with what I had and based on that I had a 125% chance of Obama winning’. He gets all the credit for being right and none of the discredit for being wrong.


21 posted on 11/04/2012 11:49:15 AM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tom Riker

This information is a huge admission on Nate Silver’s part. Up until now he has used cherry picked polls under the guise that his statistical analysis was sufficient to determine which polls are reliable. His analysis claimed he was smart enough to only rely on those polls which are reliable.


22 posted on 11/04/2012 11:50:44 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom Riker
Let's be clear. Silver is a douche, and has received a ridiculous amount of praise for what is essentially a Monte Carlo statistical analysis of existing polls. He is "reporting" what anyone could report with an elementary understanding of statistical probabilities.

If Silver had been sitting next to me at Game 5 of the NLDS in DC, he would have told me the Nationals had a 96% probability of winning in the top of the fourth. He would have told me the Nationals STILL had an overwhelming edge in the bottom of the ninth with two out and two strikes.

The problem with everyone who takes Silver seriously is that he is merely spouting objective statistics based on polling data that is not validated and can never be, with respect to Tuesday's vote.

If the polls showing Obama winning are right, then Silver is right. If they are wrong, he is still "right". He is not an analyst, and he will be the first to throw the polls under the bus when he is "wrong". Silver's reports are liberal masturbation.

23 posted on 11/04/2012 12:13:49 PM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom Riker

In reality, Nate Silver is probably just some guy who does his “analysis” in between World of Warcraft sessions while living in his mother’s basement.


24 posted on 11/04/2012 12:19:20 PM PST by Mitt Romney (Clear Eyes...Full Hearts...Can't Lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird

Just when I thought I was over the game 5 catastrophe...


25 posted on 11/04/2012 1:00:23 PM PST by pgkdan (A vote for anyone but Romney is a vote for obama. GO MITT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

I apologize. I find that talking about it helps.


26 posted on 11/04/2012 2:13:49 PM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson