Newt on Hannity: Romney will win 53-47, with 300+ EV and R will carry senate

11/2/12 | Self

[NoobRep]

Just heard Newt on Hannity calmly predict Romney 53-47, 300+ EV and Republicans will win the senate.

[who knows what evil?]

I hope Severin’s right, because I would hate to set that stuff off at 1 or 2 in the morning...

[HomeAtLast]

I’ve heard from 2 people who have never been off more than 2 points on any presidential race since 1960: Romney will win by 8.

Four more days. Four more days!

[Egregious Philbin]

“...conservatives are going to come together and decide they do not want a Massachusetts liberal to be the Republican nominee” - Newt Gingrich

[Capt. Tom]

I hope Newt is right.

Prior to reading this article here is an e- mail I sent to my friends:

Weds morning breakfast will certainly be different, with the Presidential election being held the day before. Things will certainly change no matter who is elected. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ My prediction would be a Romney win, 52%-47%; with 1% outside of Romney and Obama going to misc. candidates etc. Romney about 310 electoral votes.(270 needed to get elected) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the Senate race- The recent poll underdog , liberal Scott Brown and the ultra liberal Elizabeth Warren, end up in a recount in that election. Socialists always recount better than dumb Republicans so Warren will win it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[newfreep]

In this case, a Mass liberal is faaaaar better than a marxist mooslum.

Buy a vowel and get a clue!

[MplsSteve]

“Only difference is that Carter had fewer crooks around him.”

True.

The media (back then) was left of center but could be counted on to be at times impartial in their reporting. That impartiality (along with journalistic integrity) disappeared years ago.

The worse part? There’s no shame on their parts. They still go around professing to be impartial and fair in their reporting. I might respect them more if they came out and said “Folks, you know what? We are biased very much in favor of Democrats. We fully support their agenda and candidates”.

[nhwingut]

You really offer nothing constructive - just snark and negativity in every thread. Its almost a concerted effort to paint doom and gloom.

Newt Gingrich has a bit more credibility than you as a political analyst.

In case you were not aware, an incumbent president at 47% nationally is in deep trouble so you can concern and mock all you want. Mitt Romney has worked hard to be in this position, as has his team. He has a better than 50% chance to be the next POTUS.

Take care.

[cripplecreek]

There’s a pretty strong late push for Pete Hoekstra here in Michigan.

http://hoekstraforsenate.com/

[cripplecreek]

I’m not Newt’s biggest fan but he is a pro and probably has a pretty good sense of things.

[Patton@Bastogne]

.


“...conservatives are going to come together and decide they do not want a Massachusetts liberal to be the Republican nominee” - Newt Gingrich


Yep, that's right. Excatly right.


Conservatives "did in fact" come together and unite on the purpose ...

Unfortunately ... Myth's Wall Street Tens-of-Millions "bought" the nomination for the "Severely Conservative" Myth Romney.

Even Rush Limbaugh would agree with that assessment.



Let's fast-forward to 2016 ...

If Myth Romney governs in "any way" like he did before ...

1) Pro Gay Marriage

2) Pro Abortion

3) Pro Socialized National Health Care


then Newt's prediction will INDEED be true.



I give it a better than 65-35 chance.

See you around.

.

[tomkat]

memo to our side :

             

[DarthVader]

Why don’t you just admit to us that you are a Roach Paul or Virgil Goode supporter.

[Inyo-Mono]

I take it you are not going to vote for anyone?

[Patton@Bastogne]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2953862/posts .... post 174

[CatOwner]

Then that would be a lie. Unlike some Republicans, I didn't vote for Obama nor choose to stay home in 2008. My Romney vote has been turned in.

What the heck is Newt going to say anyway? People seem to forget a lot of the nonsense Newt has spewed out over the years. I understand the desire to rid the White House of Obama, but I am not going to be blind. Most everyone here is looking at the election as a die-hard GOP supporter (BTW, I've never voted DEM in a presidential election). I look at this as someone who was IND for several years, and what they hear and read. The MSM has put forth a good roadblock to Romney. I pray there are enough states to put him at 270+ on Election Day.

[Inyo-Mono]

I hear you.

[EDINVA]

Barone knows his Congressional Districts inside out. Like, every last one in the U.S. I don’t know to what extent he polls, but he has the demographics down, the voting histories, the current pulse. He’s really amazing on this stuff.

[SunkenCiv]

It’s going to be Slaughterhouse 2012 at the ballot box, a repudiation of the Demagogic Party. Thanks NoobRep.

[Sam Gamgee]

I just don't know. Romney's momentum looks bust and these jobs numbers could make the numbers break for Obama.

[jimsin]

YOU MEAN THE RESULTS WILL LOOK LIKE?:

PRESIDENT MITT VICE PRESIDENT RYAN