To: Yosemitest
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/06/in-the-senate-mccain-kerry-introduce-libya-resolution/ “The resolution authorizes force in Libya but specifies that the mission is limited in scope, with no U.S. ground troops. It grants President Obama authority for one year to advance U.S. national security interests as part of NATO’s efforts against Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi.”
McCain introduced the resolution alongside Kerry. Is this enough “consent and approval of the Senate” for your taste?
So is it only treason when 0bama does it?
Criminalizing policy differences with outgoing administrations is the domain of third world banana republics - and as I said before you went of half cocked - this wasn't even much of a policy difference.
48 posted on
10/31/2012 2:29:17 PM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
To: allmendream
If McCain worked to get consent and approval of the Senate with language which "specifies that the mission is limited in scope, with no U.S. ground troops", then THAT becomes Official U.S. Foreign Policy.
It changes things.
But it does NOT justify Barack Obama denying backup support and abandoning Chris Stevens, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith, and Tyrone S. Woods.
The ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF still committed TREASON and got Americans killed, because of politics.
And he's going to turn against Israel, and help his Muslim Brothers nuke Israel;.
49 posted on
10/31/2012 2:46:15 PM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's simple. Fight ... or Die !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson