Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
So are you saying that if the Bible doesn’t say something happened, manyone (sic) can just assume anything they want and claim it to be true?

That is almost, but not quite, exactly what I did NOT say.

Once again, I think we have succeeded in misunderstanding each other perfectly.

Did you not say:

What about Adam and his appearnce (sic) of age?

What age do you presume to know he was created as? All the Bible says is:

And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

What apparent age do you want to impose on the first human to justify that he was created at a particular age, just so you can justify everything else being created already old, just so you can poo-poo anyone who notices that things are far older than they should be based your opinion of how old things really should be?

Is meaningful conversation between the two of us possible beyond this point?

178 posted on 10/18/2012 3:06:10 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1367 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

Science at it’s best can not re-create history, there can be no repeatability. I’ll grant you that the majority consensus view is old ages but then majority viewpoints on science have been proven wrong time after time.

It’s very interesting too that this consensus viewpoint does not like to discuss any of these other natural clocks that completely contradict long ages. If your science was as sure as you think then there would be a reasonable explanation for all or most of these young ages natural clocks...

101 Evidences for a Young Age of the Earth...And the Universe
http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth

Keep in mind I already discussed with you earlier in this thread the recession of the moon and you offered nothing in reply.


179 posted on 10/19/2012 5:40:55 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Well nothing anyway other than some decades old conjectures in science fiction by Isaac Asimov.

The decay of DNA is clearly in favor of young ages. If you were more open-minded you might even do a little research to notice that there are contradictions and assumptions in the old ages viewpoint for the Earth and Universe.

Try reading ‘Starlight and Time’ by Russell Humphreys. He re-applies Einsteins equations and comes to some very interesting conclusions. Some stuff that NASA had also recently confirmed.


180 posted on 10/19/2012 6:04:33 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson