Well nothing anyway other than some decades old conjectures in science fiction by Isaac Asimov.
The decay of DNA is clearly in favor of young ages. If you were more open-minded you might even do a little research to notice that there are contradictions and assumptions in the old ages viewpoint for the Earth and Universe.
Try reading ‘Starlight and Time’ by Russell Humphreys. He re-applies Einsteins equations and comes to some very interesting conclusions. Some stuff that NASA had also recently confirmed.
Issac wrote hundreds of books, some science fiction, some science, some philosophy. I think I heard he has books in every Dewey Decimal category save one. His non-fiction works are universally acclaimed as clear and understandable explanations for those not experts in any of the topics.
The decay of DNA is clearly in favor of young ages. If you were more open-minded you might even do a little research to notice that there are contradictions and assumptions in the old ages viewpoint for the Earth and Universe.
Yes, racemization also indicates a younger age, as does soft tissue goo and cell-like structures in dino bones.
We're in the process of torturing the data, eventually it will confess.
What it says at confession is anyone's guess, mine is that we will have a better understanding of decay and preservation processes, and we'll end up with a somewhat shorter calender, but surely no shorter than recorded history, which BTW, extends past 4004 BC.
Try reading ‘Starlight and Time’ by Russell Humphreys. He re-applies Einsteins equations and comes to some very interesting conclusions. Some stuff that NASA had also recently confirmed.
I'll add it to the pile.
Still haven't gotten to Lee Strobel's The Case for Faith, The Case for Christ and The Case for Creation.
Time and money. *sigh*