Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

Sons of men were not followers of God. To me, the meaning seems clear. In a nutshell, God followers married nonbelievers.

It happens today and it’s that simple. Why is it necessarily so hard that it was that simple back then too?

Pretty women can get any man to turn his head, even dangerous women and many women will put up with bad men, provided that he is well off.


I do not see what you are getting at.

The bible says nothing about sons of men in this particular scripture, it said the sons of God married unto the daughters of men.

You are right, pretty women can turn the heads of even godly men.

At any rate i still don,t get what your disagreement is.


39 posted on 09/30/2012 7:56:53 AM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: ravenwolf

That the interpretation of sons of men were Neantherdals. That I dont agree with.


42 posted on 09/30/2012 8:06:36 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: ravenwolf

“There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.”


52 posted on 09/30/2012 10:50:50 AM PDT by Hiddigeigei ("Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish," said Dionysus - Euripides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson