Sons of men were not followers of God. To me, the meaning seems clear. In a nutshell, God followers married nonbelievers.
It happens today and it’s that simple. Why is it necessarily so hard that it was that simple back then too?
Pretty women can get any man to turn his head, even dangerous women and many women will put up with bad men, provided that he is well off.
Sons of men were not followers of God. To me, the meaning seems clear. In a nutshell, God followers married nonbelievers.
It happens today and it’s that simple. Why is it necessarily so hard that it was that simple back then too?
Pretty women can get any man to turn his head, even dangerous women and many women will put up with bad men, provided that he is well off.
The bible says nothing about sons of men in this particular scripture, it said the sons of God married unto the daughters of men.
You are right, pretty women can turn the heads of even godly men.
At any rate i still don,t get what your disagreement is.
Sons of men were not followers of God. To me, the meaning seems clear. In a nutshell, God followers married nonbelievers.
In gen it describes the creation where God makes every thing prior to the day he rested on the seventh day, every thing includes men and women.
These were the generations, which could mean that each day may have been thousands of years
It was after this that God made Adam, although he had already made man and woman there was still no one to till the earth because they did not know how.
Two creations, the first creation is where the daughters of men came from, the second creation, Adam and eve is where the sons of God came from.
That is why the scientists have not been able to find the so called missing link, because there is none.
The above is just my theory as the Bible does not tell us every thing and even if it did would we be any more apt to believe it? i think not.