Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Renfield
Washington himself freed only one slave. The other slaves became Martha's and he deemed it so.

The south was simply stuck with and happy with the system of slavery. There was no longer a need to import them. They were reproducing faster than they were dying off.

13 posted on 09/22/2012 7:04:11 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

Slavery existed all over the northern states also, especially New York. The biggest slave owner in the state of SC was a black man. And when the murdering Lincoln “freed” the slaves with his bogus emancipation, he “freed” slaves in a country he had no jurisdiction, as in the Confederate States of America. He left alone the slaves that were in border states like Kentucky and Maryland.Precisely because the majority of those states sided with him. And getting back to Jefferson, most REAL historians think his brother was the one that fathered the children with Hemmings. AND, if he had an “affair” with Hemmings, his wife was dead and he was an old man. Nothing to see here for Jefferson haters, so move along.


35 posted on 09/22/2012 7:51:03 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
Washington freed his own slaves (effective on his wife's death) but had no legal power to free slaves who belonged to his wife through inheritance. The two groups were intermarried and he didn't want to break up families so it was very difficult to come up with a solution--in a society where it was very difficult for a free black person to get anything other than the lowest-paying work. The whole legal system in Virginia was geared towards perpetuating slavery--it was only in the Revolutionary era that a mechanism was adopted to allow a slaveowner to free a slave.

Jefferson seems to have been conflicted--some of the strongest criticisms of slavery in that era are found in his writings, but he continued to hold slaves himself. He had a comfortable life at Monticello and could console himself with the notion that he treated his slaves well. Since he was deeply in debt I don't know if he could have legally given it all up and set all of his slaves free. If he could have it might have meant living the life of a poor dirt farmer--which is what the majority of his fellow-citizens were but that's not an easy change to make if you are used to a life of relative luxury. How many dirt farmers in Albemarle County drank imported wine?

It's easy to criticize him from this distance but we can't say how we would have acted if put in his situation.

57 posted on 09/22/2012 9:27:18 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson