Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

An artist's reconstruction of Homo antecessor, a hominid species that butchered and ate its own kind. A new study suggests the cannibalism was a form of territorial defense. Image: jlmaral/Flickr

Early Cannibalism Tied to Territorial Defense?

1 posted on 09/10/2012 6:08:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
Let's eat grandpa!

(Before the invention of commas!)

2 posted on 09/10/2012 6:10:40 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

So you’re saying that Jeff Dahmer just didn’t like his neighbors.


4 posted on 09/10/2012 6:24:05 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
Cacambo to the Oreillons, who have found Candide wearing a Jesuit habit and are shouting "let's eat Jesuit! Let's eat Jesuit!"

"...you think you're going to have Jesuit today. That's fine by me. Nothing could be fairer than to treat your enemies this way. The laws of nature do indeed tell us to kill our neighbor, and this is the way people behave thoughout the world. If we ourselves do not exercise our right to eat our neighbor, that's because we've got better things to et. But you haven't the same resources as we have. Certainly it is better to eat one's enemies than to leave the fruits of one's victory for the rooks and the crows."

--Voltaire, Candide, ch. 16.

5 posted on 09/10/2012 6:25:50 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
The victims, mainly children, may have been eaten as part of a strategy to defend territories against neighbors

Strategy? "That'll teach the lil' bastids to stomp around in the garden!"

8 posted on 09/10/2012 6:29:23 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Sure...it was territory...that’s it...NOT that they were hungry and the kids were easy prey...nah...THAT couldn’t be it.


10 posted on 09/10/2012 6:39:58 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

A modest proposal...


15 posted on 09/10/2012 7:16:45 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1330 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Intifadians.


16 posted on 09/10/2012 7:24:48 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (I will fear no muslim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
The victims, mainly children, may have been eaten as part of a strategy to defend territories against neighbors

Or perhaps they were just hungry.

19 posted on 09/10/2012 8:27:25 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

I wonder about this. There is a near world-wide revulsion to cannibalism and among primates and higher mammals it is not common.


23 posted on 09/11/2012 1:39:48 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson