Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Above My Pay Grade
You made an incorrect assumption

I made no assumption - I merely note that you continue to evade your unsupported claim, "if you watch the video of the local news (at about the 1:46 mark) it is clear that the warrant was for BOTH her tenant’s home and her personal residence." No such thing is "clear" from any part of the video or text.

122 posted on 09/06/2012 1:59:11 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: JustSayNoToNannies

The repoter clearly stated that both addresses were on the warrant.

If you think the reporter was lying about this, he could be lying about just about any aspect of the story.

Did this really happen in Buffalo and not Detroit or Denver, or on Mars? Prove it, and not by what the lying reporters said or wrote but by video evidence, as that is the standard you are holding me to.

Did the dog really get shot? Show me the video, or by your standard, it didn’t happen, as we are only going by what the reporter and the woman said.

Again, the ONLY reason that some reached the conclusion that this was the “wrong” house, was the misleading headline (and headlines are normally not written by the reporters, but rather by people who are even bigger idiots than reporters.)

If the headline read, “Dog Shot to Death During Police Raid”, nobody who read the article and watched the video would think it was the “wrong house”.


125 posted on 09/07/2012 8:57:51 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson