The repoter clearly stated that both addresses were on the warrant.
If you think the reporter was lying about this, he could be lying about just about any aspect of the story.
Did this really happen in Buffalo and not Detroit or Denver, or on Mars? Prove it, and not by what the lying reporters said or wrote but by video evidence, as that is the standard you are holding me to.
Did the dog really get shot? Show me the video, or by your standard, it didn’t happen, as we are only going by what the reporter and the woman said.
Again, the ONLY reason that some reached the conclusion that this was the “wrong” house, was the misleading headline (and headlines are normally not written by the reporters, but rather by people who are even bigger idiots than reporters.)
If the headline read, “Dog Shot to Death During Police Raid”, nobody who read the article and watched the video would think it was the “wrong house”.
The repoter clearly stated that both addresses were on the warrant.
That the reporter STATES this is ALL that' clear - NOT, as you claimed, "if you watch the video of the local news (at about the 1:46 mark) it is clear that the warrant was for BOTH her tenant’s home and her personal residence."
If you think the reporter was lying about this,
I think it possible he was mistaken.
Again, the ONLY reason that some reached the conclusion that this was the “wrong” house,
Then go argue with "some".
was the misleading headline (and headlines are normally not written by the reporters, but rather by people who are even bigger idiots than reporters.)
So reporters are idiots - but never get their facts wrong?