Are you really that obtuse?
The woman never claimed there was no warrant for her house. The reporter (who had the search warrant in front of him) claimed that the warrant listed both houses and nobody has disputed this (except you).
You made an incorrect assumption (though a reasonable one, at the time, based upon the misleading headline) and just can’t let go of it, no matter what the facts show. Are you sure you aren’t a Democrat?
I made no assumption - I merely note that you continue to evade your unsupported claim, "if you watch the video of the local news (at about the 1:46 mark) it is clear that the warrant was for BOTH her tenant’s home and her personal residence." No such thing is "clear" from any part of the video or text.
Where on the warrant is the woman’s address?
Why are you unwilling to show the place on the warrant where the woman’s address appears?