Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Current Occupant
Kinda like that show except when they call an engine a motor.

Harlan Fengler, Chief Steward of the Indianapolis 500 in the 1960s, was arguing with a race driver (I forget who it was) about the use of the term motor for engine.

The driver told Fengler "Then why don't they call it the Indianapolis Engine Speedway?

16 posted on 08/07/2012 1:07:10 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: nascarnation

Good point.


17 posted on 08/07/2012 1:10:43 PM PDT by Current Occupant (If you're not pi$$ed, you ain't paying attention!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation
Well, they used to be 'motors.' But then they improved them and they became 'engines.'

≤}B^)

Apropos of very little, I am not fond of calling a railroad locomotive an 'engine.'

First, because on a steam locomotive the 'engines' are actually the steam cylinders and valves, not the whole locomotive. Some steam locos have three or four engines.

Second, because on a diesel locomotive, you want to be able to call the diesel prime mover an 'engine,' which is once again not the whole locomotive. (Some people call the diesel prime movers 'motors' and that's OK too.)

30 posted on 08/07/2012 3:18:36 PM PDT by Erasmus (Zwischen des Teufels und des tiefen, blauen Meers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson