Posted on 07/22/2012 9:32:41 PM PDT by Altariel
Maybe if the police officer had arrived just a minute later, the young man would still be alive.
That’s what the friends and family of Destin Thomas say, after Columbus police confirmed yesterday that it was one of their own officers who shot and killed Thomas while responding to a 911 call he had made on Tuesday morning.
Police gave few details yesterday about what happened between the 21-year-old Thomas and Officer William Kaufman, a 17-year veteran, citing the ongoing investigation.
They said that Kaufman shot Thomas twice, in his hip and chest. Thomas died at the scene.
“The fact that they’re trying to justify it, no apology or nothing, (just saying), ‘Oh, we’re just doing what we were trained to do,’” said Thomas’ cousin Derek Harris, 24. “I didn’t know you were trained to kill the person you were supposed to help.”
Police also said yesterday that they’ve charged a man who they had said earlier was thought to be involved in the break-in at Thomas’ Far East Side apartment — the reason that Thomas had called police.
David J. O’Neal, 19, of Shaker Heights, Ohio, is charged with grand theft auto, vandalism and receiving stolen property — all fourth-degree felonies — as well as a count of obstructing official business, a fifth-degree felony.
All of those charges are in connection to a stolen police cruiser that authorities say O’Neal took from an officer who was patrolling about a half-mile from Thomas’ apartment on Tuesday afternoon.
So far, O’Neal hasn’t been charged in the break-in, though Sgt. Rich Weiner, spokesman for Columbus police, said other charges could be filed. O’Neal was in the Fairfield County jail tonight under $500,000 bond.
Thomas was found with a gun next to his body, but police haven’t said where that gun came from or whether Thomas even had it in his hand when he was shot.
His roommate and cousin have both said that Thomas didn’t own a gun, and they think he somehow got the weapon off the men who broke into his apartment at 7277 Brooke Blvd.
Thomas’ roommate, DelShawn Walker, 22, said his friend had no interest in guns. “He said on several occasions, ‘I don’t plan on getting a gun. I don’t need one,’” he said.
Walker and Harris are angry with police. Thomas was the one the police were supposed to be protecting, they said.
“If (the officer) didn’t show up on time, he’d still be alive today, because he did their job for them (by chasing the burglars out),” Harris said.
Police have said that Officer Kaufman saw Thomas and another man run from the apartment. A neighbor said that a third man also ran from it, though police so far have arrested only O'Neal.
When Thomas called 911 at 8:46 a.m. Tuesday, he said in a whispered voice that people had broken into his apartment and he could hear them talking.
O’Neal was caught several hours later when Police Officer Billie Camp-Donovan saw him and recognized him as a suspect wanted in connection with the break-in. She jumped from her cruiser to chase him, and he doubled back and stole the cruiser, police say. Camp-Donovan then fired six gunshots at the cruiser, though she didn’t hit O’Neal.
The county prosecutor’s office will review both officers’ actions.
Walker and Harris wonder why, if Thomas was holding a gun when he ran from his apartment, the officer didn’t ask him to put it down. Knowing Thomas, they said, he would have immediately.
“I honestly believe he was trying to tell them, ‘I’m the one who called you,’” Walker said. “But they didn’t give him a chance.”
Police officers, though, say they have little time to sort out a situation when someone is holding a weapon.
Because of the rash of recent police shootings, officers held a demonstration of how they handle confrontations with armed people for media representatives at the Police Training Academy today.
Columbus Police Chief Kimberley Jacobs said it’s impossible for officers to predict what a person intends to do when that person approaches with a weapon.
“We have to be able to react in instantaneous fashion,” she said.
Asked if she was concerned that Thomas might have been wrongly shot, she said it “would be concerning if someone who has no (malicious intent) toward an officer was shot.”
“But we can’t predict that, and we can’t know that when someone has a gun in their hand.”
That explanation is little comfort to Thomas’ friend and cousin.
|
|
|
|
Unbelievable.
Totally believable.
Poor guy didn’t have a dog for the cop to shoot, so...
It’s apparently best to call 911 after the shooting stops and the guns are cleaned and put away.
This reads like a bad movie.
The guy calls the cops, they show up and kill him. With a convenient throw down at his side, perhaps, of course.
Then the female officer gets her car stolen by someone she is chasing?
You are better off on your own.
At least then only the bunglers might be the only ones you need to worry about.
No mention of a dog. Must have been a slow day for PD.
Cops don’t make mistakes. sarc
The way I understand the police comments is that if they see you with a gun in hand they will shoot immediately!
After they have to be sure of their safety.
The officer ought be fired and prosecuted as should his bosses in the police department.
Rich... Richard... Dick Weiner.
Do parents give even the slightest thought to their new baby's name?
There’s no situation that can’t be made worse by calling the cops.
He was just chasing a criminal the cops didn’t want to chase.
We can’t have peple supposing they are free citizens with the authority to make a citizen’s arrest, now can we?
</s>
Camp-Donovan then fired six gunshots at the cruiser, though she didn’t hit O’Neal.
Did she even hit the car?
Cruiser? Old term for a police car or navy ship or crusier weight boxer?
With her skill she could have hit all three and the dog too.
but who’s counting?
There’s nothing new here. Columbus cops have a long history replete with squirrelly shoots, incompetence, and unprofessional behavior.
When I was at at OSU many moons ago, the CPD had the reputation for being a bunch of trigger-happy yahoos with shit-for-brains who loved writing jaywalking tickets. I see little has changed.
Excuse me?Holding aversion is a constitutionally protected, inherent right. Thats sort of what "bear arms" means
“Aversion” s/b “a weapon”
Damned autocorrect
No, a different party is the beneficiary of the service and protection of the police—the State and its interests.
You should read this article if you haven’t already.
Back in te day they used to just call that 'shoot first and ask questions later'!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.