Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer
Apparently she started with holding rent only after problems occurred and repairs not done. This is what the court believed and I also believe it.

Had the landlord addressed and corrected the p[problems, she would have been forced to make restitution in the form of back rent and interest. As is the case, the landlord was forced to accept zero rent for several years totaling 35K as restitution to the renter of the property. He has also been orderred to correct any problems.

She used the only recourse available to her, with holding rent. That is a moral and legal way to handle a reluctant landlord in almost any area of the country.

33 posted on 06/14/2012 9:20:40 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Jim from C-Town

I’m done with this. Not worth arguing about.


35 posted on 06/14/2012 9:22:19 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson