Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

Uh, would it not make MORE sense to WEIGH the reindeer, polar bears, giraffes and elephants? and then calculate the skeletal ratios and apply that to dinosaurs? This approach seems to mean that all dinosaurs would have to look like Twiggy!


14 posted on 06/05/2012 11:32:13 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker
Uh, would it not make MORE sense to WEIGH the reindeer, polar bears, giraffes and elephants? and then calculate the skeletal ratios and apply that to dinosaurs?

That's how they did it. Take a modern skeleton, determine the minimum wrap volume, take known body density figures, that gives a minimum body weight for the animal. But actual measured animals in the natural state weigh in at 20% more than this.

Do the same for a dino skeleton to get the minimum weight. Now assume wild dinos were more like modern animals than roly-poly butterballs, so use the same 20% addition to get natural weight.

16 posted on 06/06/2012 10:52:39 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Gott mit Mitt, Mitt mit uns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson