Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/04/2012 9:22:43 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I ain’t worried about the climate anyway. There is nothing we can do about it. It is what it is and it is going to do what it wants to do. Always has, always will. Thus, why worry about something you can do nothng about. One less headache.


2 posted on 06/04/2012 9:25:37 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Paul said the world would look like in the last days: See Romans 1: 13-32 for the examples.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; landsbaum; Signalman; NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; Lancey Howard; ...

Well...now what?


3 posted on 06/04/2012 9:26:10 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I've been watching "Frozen Planet" lately.

The amount of melt-off every single year at both poles due merely to seasonal change is astounding. There is no way that we would have any sort of flooding even if both entire poles melted away.

5 posted on 06/04/2012 9:34:09 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

And we Freepers are like the Encyclopediasts at the far end of the galaxy, keeping alive the possibility of civilization regenerating after only 1000 years. I sometimes feel like we are the only ones that actually know how to make things work.


6 posted on 06/04/2012 9:36:03 AM PDT by Explorer89 (And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

One man’s psychohistory is another man’s propaganda.


8 posted on 06/04/2012 9:38:21 AM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The more you know ABOUT GOD, the less worried you are about climate...

There fixed it!!


9 posted on 06/04/2012 9:39:40 AM PDT by wizr (Keep the Faith!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Not needing to read this because, climate change is natural. Man is not responsible. Man couldn't do ANYTHING about it anyway. God is in control.

The BP oil spill is the grand example of man's impotence in dealing with grand scale events. It is just beyond man's ability.

First man could do nothing to stem the oil flow. A man converted a giant ship that could clean up all the oil in a few days, it didn't work. Even Kevin Cosner’s, of Waterworld fame, invention proved inadequate to deal with the problem. Oil kept flowing, and man kept failing.

Then God, who had created oil eating bacteria, came to the rescue. The biggest oil spill in U.S. history became a non issue because of oil eating bacteria that existed since the beginning of time.

Dealing with GLOBAL climate change, is exponentially more difficult than dealing with some puny oil sill, that man was totally incapable of doing.

Why would anyone with a brain think we could affect climate change? If you can't change a thing, then why worry about it at all?

10 posted on 06/04/2012 9:39:52 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

My B.S. in Chemistry and Ph.D. in Biochemistry, but maybe more importantly my 71 years of living through hot and cold decades of “change”, makes me quite sure that we are not in any unusual or imminent danger from global warming/climate change.


11 posted on 06/04/2012 9:41:57 AM PDT by FairWitness (Everything is easy, once you've done it once)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Well...We all knew anything Al Gore said had zero to do with science...


13 posted on 06/04/2012 9:50:22 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

June 4 and it’s sprinkling here, if we’re lucky we get a good drenching.. knock all the dust and carbon down. ;-)


16 posted on 06/04/2012 10:05:18 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I’m hardly surprised at all by the results of this polling. Just try sometime to engage a leftist type in a scientific discussion of Global Warming and you will get nowhere. The lefties are not interested in the science, could care less about the science but they “know” they are on the right side of the issue. They just “know”.


19 posted on 06/04/2012 10:27:04 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (TIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Check out this informative video from the Australian Galileo Movement that puts CO2 in perspective. Video

The Galileo Movement is a group of Aussi scientist leading opposition to the carbon taxes enacted by the Labour government.

20 posted on 06/04/2012 10:35:25 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The soft-studies profs were amazed, however, to find that as one moves up the scale of [hard] science knowledge and numeracy, people become more sceptical, not less.

So the folks who deal in real projects with physically demonstrable results don't believe the charlatans who are blowing smoke with theories having little connection to reality. I can buy that!

22 posted on 06/04/2012 10:51:52 AM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
How much education does one need to read a couple of charts like this and realize that man-made Glowbull Warming is the biggest bunch of horse hockey that ever came down the pike?

Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud

Sea levels began to rise 18k years ago at the end of the last glacial period. They have risen about 135 meters since then which is an average of 7.5 millimeters per year. That is an average of 750 mm per century (29.5 inches) which is far more than the average over the last century.


23 posted on 06/04/2012 11:02:18 AM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, the Earth Is Cooling

Latest from CO2 Science

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

29 posted on 06/06/2012 12:52:28 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The reporter refers to "soft" science, but in fact this isn't really science at all. "Hard" scientists are concerned with what is truth; "soft" scientists in this sense are concerned with how best to influence people's thinking. The latter is actually rhetoric, not science, even if its methods appear to be scientific.

The intention of the study was not, in fact, to measure the relationship between mathematical and logical ability and a conviction that AGW is truth, it was to produce a document that is designed to suppress dissent on the topic by implying that dissenters are less intelligent than true believers. It failed because the only science in it wouldn't cooperate.

It also failed because those who are relatively numerate recognize this affair for the con game it is and tend to be less swayed by "consensus" in the non-consensual mechanism that is science. One and one is not three no matter how earnestly the rhetoricians insist that it would be beneficial to society to pretend that it is, and the skeptic may well be ridiculed for insisting otherwise but he will not be wrong.

36 posted on 06/06/2012 10:04:41 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson